首页> 外文OA文献 >A Question of Birthing Philosophy:A Qualitative Study of Maternity Care Decision-Making Paradigms
【2h】

A Question of Birthing Philosophy:A Qualitative Study of Maternity Care Decision-Making Paradigms

机译:分娩哲学问题:对孕产保健决策制定范式的定性研究

摘要

BACKGROUND: Medicalization has led to the standardization of American maternity care and limited the choices of pregnant women by restricting their access to alternative types of care. While there is evidence that women are dissatisfied with this trend, very little is known about how pregnant women make decisions in the current maternity care environment. OBJECTIVE: To describe the conceptual frameworks women use in making maternity care and birth decisions by exploring the context in which these choices are made. METHODS: In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 22 women between March and December of 2010. RESULTS: Three major themes emerged from the data. The first theme is that women take an active role in their own maternity care through the formation of goals, some of which were better served by the maternity care system than others. Second, women articulated underlying birth philosophies and discussed the philosophies of their caregivers. Dissonance between a patient's birth philosophy and that of her provider led to tension and mistrust. The final theme is a discussion of choice and barriers in maternity care. The lack of choice that many women experienced led to difficulties in receiving the type and amount of maternity care that was most appropriate for them and resulted in frustration and dissatisfaction with the provision of their care. CONCLUSION: These findings call for expanded access to nonstandard maternity care, the removal of barriers to alternative care, and more vigilant observation of fully informed consent. Quality maternity care must provide support for meaningful choices whether or not those decisions reflect current maternity care norms. PUBLIC HEALTH SIGNIFICANCE: Over four million women become pregnant and give birth in the United States each year. Pregnancy and birth account for one in every five female hospitalizations and a quarter of all hospital stays. Given its magnitude, the quality of maternity care services is an important measure of overall healthcare quality and thus a critical public health concern.
机译:背景:医学化已导致美国产妇护理的标准化,并通过限制孕妇获得其他类型的护理而限制了她们的选择。尽管有证据表明妇女对这一趋势不满意,但对孕妇如何在当前的产妇保健环境中做出决定的了解甚少。目的:通过探索做出这些选择的背景,来描述妇女在进行孕产保健和分娩决定时所使用的概念框架。方法:在2010年3月至12月之间,对22位女性进行了深入,半结构化的访谈。结果:从数据中得出了三个主要主题。第一个主题是,妇女通过制定目标在自己的生育服务中发挥积极作用,其中一些目标比生育目标更好。其次,妇女阐明了基本的生育哲学,并讨论了其照料者的哲学。患者的分娩哲学与提供者的分娩哲学不协调,导致紧张和不信任。最后一个主题是讨论产妇护理中的选择和障碍。许多妇女缺乏选择余地,导致难以获得最适合她们的产妇护理的类型和数量,并导致对她们提供的护理感到沮丧和不满。结论:这些发现要求扩大获得非标准产妇保健的机会,消除替代保健的障碍,并更加警惕地观察到知情同意。高质量的孕产保健必须为有意义的选择提供支持,无论这些决定是否反映了当前的孕产保健规范。公共卫生意义:每年在美国有超过四百万名妇女怀孕并生育。怀孕和分娩占女性住院人数的五分之一,占所有住院时间的四分之一。鉴于其规模,产妇护理服务的质量是衡量整体医疗质量的重要指标,因此也是对公共卫生的关注。

著录项

  • 作者

    Felman Kristyn L;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号