首页> 外文OA文献 >HOSPITALS DISCHARGING PATIENTS TO EMERGENCY HOMELESS SHELTERS IN ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA: AN ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
【2h】

HOSPITALS DISCHARGING PATIENTS TO EMERGENCY HOMELESS SHELTERS IN ALLEGHENY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA: AN ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE

机译:宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县的急诊无家可归者住院患者的生态学视角

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objectives: This study, utilizing the socio-ecological perspective, assesses the number of hospital discharges to shelters, their perceived appropriateness, and possible solutions to problems of inappropriate discharges. The socio-ecological perspective is employed to explore individual, community, and political factors involved in inappropriate discharging. Methods: Twenty-two staff and administrators from 12 of the 16 emergency homeless shelters in Allegheny County, PA were recruited by mailings (response rate=75%). A face-to-face, semi-structured interview was conducted with each of the 22 participants. Participants were asked to report on the number of discharges they received from hospitals in the past 12 months, whether or not these discharges were appropriate, and on possible solutions to the problem of "inappropriate discharges." Results: Participants reported a total of 415 discharges from hospitals to shelters; 91 (22%) of the discharges were considered to be inappropriate. The two solutions most often reported by participants to the problem of "inappropriate discharge" were to cultivate bidirectional communication between hospitals and shelters, and to develop medical/psychiatric respite for the homeless population (50%, and 32% the respectively). Participants believed that the responsibility for the problem of inappropriate discharges rested at multiple levels of the ecological system including the individual, organizational, and political levels. Participants proposed solutions that targeted homeless individuals, shelters, hospitals, and policy makers. Conclusions: Inappropriate discharges are a problem in Allegheny County, PA and better communication amongst providers and the development of respite services are possible solutions. The etiological nature of this problem rests at multiple levels of the ecological system including the individual, organizational, and political levels, and thus interventions ought to be targeting these levels. Public Health Significance: Ensuring that homeless persons receive appropriate follow-up care may eventually reduce the number of re-hospitalizations, improve the overall health of the homeless population, and aid in the fight to eliminate homelessness.
机译:目标:这项研究利用社会生态学的观点,评估了医院向收容所出院的数量,其出院的适当性以及对不适当出院问题的可能解决方案。运用社会生态学的观点来探讨涉及不当排放的个人,社区和政治因素。方法:通过邮件招募宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县16个紧急无家可归者收容所中的12个工作人员和管理人员(回复率为75%)。对22位参与者进行了面对面的半结构化访谈。要求参与者报告在过去的12个月中他们从医院收到的出院数量,这些出院是否合适以及“不适当出院”问题的可能解决方案。结果:参与者报告说,总共有415次从医院出院到庇护所; 91%(22%)的排放被认为是不合适的。参与者最常报告的“出院不当”问题的两种解决方案是在医院和庇护所之间建立双向交流,并为无家可归者发展医疗/精神病喘息的机会(分别为50%和32%)。与会者认为,对不适当排放问题的责任在于生态系统的多个层面,包括个人,组织和政治层面。参与者提出了针对无家可归者,庇护所,医院和政策制定者的解决方案。结论:不适当的排放是宾夕法尼亚州阿勒格尼县的一个问题,提供者之间更好的沟通以及发展暂息服务是可能的解决方案。这个问题的病因本质在于生态系统的多个层面,包括个人,组织和政治层面,因此,干预措施应该针对这些层面。公共卫生意义:确保无家可归者得到适当的后续护理可能最终减少重新住院的次数,改善无家可归者的整体健康状况,并有助于消除无家可归者。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bear Todd M;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号