首页> 外文OA文献 >The Impact of Media Bias on Coverage of Catastrophic Events:Case Study from The New York Times' Coverage of the Palestine/Israel Conflict
【2h】

The Impact of Media Bias on Coverage of Catastrophic Events:Case Study from The New York Times' Coverage of the Palestine/Israel Conflict

机译:媒体偏见对灾难性事件报道的影响:《纽约时报》对巴勒斯坦/以色列冲突报道的案例研究

摘要

This study investigates how the impact of media bias affects the news coverage of catastrophic events with regard to the Palestine/Israel conflict. Particularly, this study focuses on Operation Cast Lead, the 3-week Israeli military assault on the Gaza Strip that resulted in the death of nearly 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis. The Times' manner of covering the conflict, characterized in previous research as manifesting media bias toward Israel, is examined within a context of media manipulation, misrepresentation, framing, slant, and linguistic determinism. This study provides insight into the role played by the mainstream media in distorting the facts of the Palestine/Israel conflict in order to present a picture that portrays Israel in a more favorable light.Ninety-one articles were chosen from the New York Times' news and editorial coverage of Operation Cast Lead, from December 27, 2008 to January 18, 2009, plus an additional week as to allow for corrections and further coverage. This study employs content analysis to determine how the New York Times presents their stories and how often they report Palestinian deaths and injuries incurred during the catastrophic period versus the number of Israeli deaths and injuries covered in the texts. B'Tselem, the Israeli human rights organization, provides data on the number of deaths and injuries during Operation Cast Lead, providing the quantitative base to which this study's results are compared. Although Palestinians died at a rate 106 times more than Israelis, the New York Times engaged in a practice of media bias that resulted in coverage of only 3% of Palestinian deaths in the headlines and first paragraphs. Upon analyzing the articles' entireties, this study found that the New York Times covered 431% of Israeli deaths and only 17% of Palestinian deaths, a ratio of 25:1. Only 17% of Palestinian children deaths were covered in the full articles.
机译:这项研究调查了媒体偏见的影响如何影响有关巴勒斯坦/以色列冲突的灾难性事件的新闻报道。特别是,这项研究的重点是“铸铅行动”,这是以色列对加沙地带进行的为期3周的军事攻击,造成近1400名巴勒斯坦人和13名以色列人死亡。 《泰晤士报》报道冲突的方式在以前的研究中表现为媒体偏向以色列,这是在媒体操纵,虚假陈述,框架,偏见和语言决定论的背景下进行考察的。这项研究提供了对主流媒体在歪曲巴勒斯坦/以色列冲突事实中所发挥的作用的见解,以便以更有利的眼光描绘以色列的情况。《纽约时报》新闻选出了91篇文章从2008年12月27日至2009年1月18日,以及《铸铅行动》的社论报道,再加上一周时间,以便进行更正和进一步报道。这项研究采用内容分析法来确定《纽约时报》如何讲述他们的故事,以及他们多久报告一次灾难性事件期间发生的巴勒斯坦人的伤亡情况以及文本中所涵盖的以色列伤亡人数。以色列人权组织B'Tselem提供了“铸铅行动”期间死亡和受伤人数的数据,并提供了与本研究结果进行比较的定量依据。尽管巴勒斯坦人的死亡率是以色列人的106倍,但《纽约时报》采取了偏见性的做法,导致头条新闻和第一段仅报道了3%的巴勒斯坦人死亡。在对文章的整体进行分析之后,该研究发现《纽约时报》报道了431%的以色列人死亡,而只有17%的巴勒斯坦人死亡,比率为25:1。整篇文章仅涵盖了17%的巴勒斯坦儿童死亡。

著录项

  • 作者

    Caballero Jonas Xavier;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号