首页> 外文OA文献 >Examining Pre-Service Science Teachers' Developing Pedagogical Design Capacity for Planning and Supporting Task-Based Classroom Discussions
【2h】

Examining Pre-Service Science Teachers' Developing Pedagogical Design Capacity for Planning and Supporting Task-Based Classroom Discussions

机译:检验职前科学教师的教学设计能力,以计划和支持基于任务的课堂讨论

摘要

Teachers face many challenges as we move forward into the age of the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS) (Achieve, Inc., 2013). The NGSS aim to develop a population of scientifically literate and talented students who can participate in the “innovation-driven economy” (p. 1). In order to meet these goals, teachers must provide students with opportunities to engage in science and engineering practices (SEPs) and learn core ideas of these disciplines.udThis study followed pre-service secondary science teachers as they participated in a secondary science teacher preparation program intended to support the development of their pedagogical design capacity (Brown, 2009) related to planning and supporting whole-class task-based discussions. Teacher educators in this program designed an intervention that aimed in supporting this development. This study examined a particular dimension of PDC – specifically, PSTs effective use of resources to plan science lessons in which students engage in a high demand task, participate in SEPs, and discuss their work in a whole-class setting. In order to examine the effectiveness of the intervention, I had to define PDC a priori. I measured PDC by documenting how/whether PSTs engaged in the following instructional planning practices: developing Learning Goals, selecting and/or designing challenging tasks, anticipating student thinking, planning for monitoring student thinking, imagining the discussion storyline, planning questions, and planning marking strategies. udAnalyses showed a significant difference between baseline lesson plan scores and Instructional Performance scores. These findings suggest these patterns and changes were directly linked to the teacher preparation program. The mean increase in Instructional Performance scores during the course of the teacher preparation year further supports the effect of the teacher preparation coursework. udPre-service teachers with high pedagogical design capacity continually integrated the ambitious planning practices they learned in their coursework. In contrast, pre-service teachers with low pedagogical design capacity appeared to appropriate the vocabulary and language they learned in coursework, but did not integrate these practices at a high level. This study suggests that pre-service teachers who receive intensive instruction on ambitious planning practices for task-based discussion effectively develop the pedagogical design capacity to plan for task-based discussion lessons.ud
机译:随着我们迈入下一代科学标准(NGSS)时代,教师面临许多挑战(Achieve,Inc.,2013年)。 NGSS旨在培养一群能够参加“创新驱动型经济”的具有科学素养和才华的学生(第1页)。为了实现这些目标,教师必须为学生提供参与科学和工程实践(SEP)的机会,并学习这些学科的核心思想。 ud这项研究是在职前中学科学教师参加中学科学教师准备工作之后进行的该计划旨在支持他们的教学设计能力的发展(Brown,2009),与计划和支持基于任务的全班讨论有关。该计划中的教师教育者设计了旨在支持这一发展的干预措施。这项研究检查了PDC的特定方面-特别是PST有效地利用资源来计划科学课,在这些课中,学生从事高要求的任务,参加SEP并在全班环境中讨论他们的工作。为了检查干预的有效性,我必须先定义PDC。我通过记录PST如何/是否参与以下教学计划实践来衡量PDC:制定学习目标,选择和/或设计具有挑战性的任务,预测学生的思想,规划监视学生的思想,想象讨论故事情节,规划问题和规划标记策略。 ud分析显示,基线课程计划分数和教学绩效分数之间存在显着差异。这些发现表明,这些模式和变化与教师准备计划直接相关。在教师准备年的课程中,教学绩效分数的平均提高进一步支持了教师准备课程工作的效果。 ud具有高教学设计能力的职前教师不断地将他们在课程中学到的雄心勃勃的计划实践进行整合。相比之下,教学设计能力低的职前教师似乎在学习课程时会采用他们所学的词汇和语言,但并没有在高水平上整合这些实践。这项研究表明,接受有关雄心勃勃的计划练习进行基于任务的讨论的强化培训的岗前教师可以有效地开发教学设计能力,以计划基于任务的讨论课。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Ross Danielle/K;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号