首页> 外文OA文献 >Using participatory design and visual narrative inquiry to investigate researchers’ data challenges and recommendations for library research data services
【2h】

Using participatory design and visual narrative inquiry to investigate researchers’ data challenges and recommendations for library research data services

机译:使用参与式设计和视觉叙事查询来调查研究人员的数据挑战和对图书馆研究数据服务的建议

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

© 2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to report on an information gathering study on users’ research data-related challenges and proposals for library research data services (RDS). This study probes how early career researchers visually conceptualize the research process in their disciplines, their self-reported research data challenges, and their recommendations for library RDS. Design/methodology/approach – Two focus group sessions were undertaken with a total of eight early career researchers. Adopting the visual narrative inquiry method, the participants were asked to sketch the general research process in their domain. The individuals’ illustrations of the research process were then used as the basis for reflecting on their data-related needs and potential RDS that would assist them during the research process. Findings – Participants presented a research process that was more personal and, in most cases, more imperfect than the research lifecycle models that academic libraries are increasingly using for RDS development and communication. The authors present their data-related challenges, which included data access barriers, low knowledge of best practices for research data management, the need for a deeper understanding of post-publication impact, and inconsistent awareness of existing library and institution RDS. The authors outline RDS recommendations that participants proposed, which included a web-based tools, customized training sessions, and “distilled” guides to research data best practices. Practical implications – The study flagged users’ gaps in understandings of existing library and institutional RDS, suggesting that there may be an opportunity to engage users in the design of communications plans for services. The findings from this user study will inform the development of RDS at the institution. Originality/value – This paper puts forth a methodological approach that academic libraries can adapt for understanding users’ needs and user-generated design solutions.
机译:©2015,翡翠集团出版有限公司。目的–本文的目的是报告有关用户研究数据相关挑战的信息收集研究以及针对图书馆研究数据服务(RDS)的建议。这项研究探讨了早期职业研究人员如何在视觉上概念化其学科的研究过程,自我报告的研究数据挑战以及对图书馆RDS的建议。设计/方法/方法–进行了两次焦点小组会议,共有八名早期职业研究人员参加。采用视觉叙事探究方法,要求参与者勾勒出各自领域的一般研究过程。然后,将个人对研究过程的说明用作反映他们与数据相关的需求和在研究过程中将对他们有帮助的潜在RDS的基础。结果–与大学图书馆越来越多的RDS开发和交流研究生命周期模型相比,参与者提出的研究过程更加个人化,并且在大多数情况下还不够完善。作者提出了与数据相关的挑战,包括数据访问障碍,对研究数据管理的最佳实践的了解不足,需要对出版后影响有更深入的了解以及对现有图书馆和机构RDS的认识不一致。作者概述了参与者提出的RDS建议,其中包括基于Web的工具,定制的培训课程以及研究数据最佳实践的“精炼”指南。实际意义–该研究标记了用户在对现有图书馆和机构RDS的理解上的差距,这表明可能有机会让用户参与设计服务的通信计划。该用户研究的结果将为该机构RDS的发展提供信息。原创性/价值–本文提出了一种方法论方法,大学图书馆可以采用这种方法来理解用户的需求和用户生成的设计解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号