首页> 外文OA文献 >UK’s National Programme for IT welcomes recommendation for a more sociotechnical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record

【2h】

UK’s National Programme for IT welcomes recommendation for a more sociotechnical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record

机译：英国的国家IT计划欢迎有关采用更具社会技术手段的评估方法的建议：有关Greenhalgh对简易医疗记录的评估的评论

代理获取

本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务，本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文，但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁，仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况，如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

页面导航

著录项
引文网络
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Lusignan S. (Simon) de; Aarts J. (José);
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2008
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. A Sociotechnical Approach to Evaluating the Impact of ICT on Clinical Care Environments [J] . Revision Received Date: The Open Medical Informatics Journal . 2010,第1期

机译：评估ICT对临床护理环境影响的社会技术方法
2. An evaluation of a national scheme for continuing professional development (CPD) for career grade doctors: the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health's programme for paediatricians evaluated by focus group methodology. [J] . Saidi G, Weindling AM Medical education . 2003,第4期

机译：对职业级医生的国家持续专业发展计划（CPD）的评估：皇家儿科与儿童健康学院的儿科医师计划由焦点小组方法进行了评估。
3. Improving the healthcare response to domestic violence and abuse in UK primary care: interrupted time series evaluation of a system-level training and support programme [J] . Alex Hardip Sohal, Gene Feder, Kambiz Boomla, BMC Medicine . 2020,第1期

机译：在英国初级保健中提高对家庭暴力和虐待的医疗保健反应：系统级培训和支持计划的中断时间序列评估
4. Clinical Support in Primary and Ambulatory Care: Canadian Lessons to be Learned from the UK Patient Summary Care Record (SCR) Initiative [C] . Chris SUTTON, Shannon MALOVEC ITCH (Conference) . 2009

机译：临床支持在小学和外国护理：加拿大课程从英国病人摘要护理记录（SCR）倡议中学到
5. Understanding, evaluating and enhancing electronic medical record adoption in a primary caresetting: A programme to improve electronic medical record data quality and its effect on familypractice provision of incentivized and enhanced care for chronic disease patients [D] . Bowen, Michael. 2013

机译：了解，评估和增强在初级护理环境中采用电子病历的方案：一项旨在提高电子病历数据质量及其对家庭实践的激励措施的计划，该方案为慢性病患者提供激励和加强护理
6. A Sociotechnical Approach to Evaluating the Impact of ICT on Clinical Care Environments [O] . Julie Li 2010

机译：评估ICT对临床护理环境影响的社会技术方法
7. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary A report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on practice guidelines (committee to revise the 1995 guidelines for the evaluation and management of heart failure) developed in collaboration with the international society for heart and lung transplantation endorsed by the heart failure society of america51The document was approved by the American College of Cardiology Board of Trustees in November 2001 and the American Heart Association Science Advisory and Coordinating Committee in September 2001.52When citing this document, the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association would appreciate the following citation format: Hunt SA, Baker DW, Chin MH, Cinquegrani MP, Feldman AM, Francis GS, Ganiats TG, Goldstein S, Gregoratos G, Jessup ML, Noble RJ, Packer M, Silver MA, Stevenson LW. ACC/AHA guidelines for the evaluation and management of chronic heart failure in the adult: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Heart Failure). J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:2101–13.53The American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association make every effort to avoid any actual or potential conflicts of interest that may arise as a result of an outside relationship or a personal, professional, or business interest of a member of the writing panel. Specifically, all members of the writing group are required to provide disclosure statements of all such relationships that might be perceived as real or potential conflicts of interest. These statements are reviewed by the parent task force, reported orally to all members of the writing panel at the first meeting, and updated as changes occur.54This document, as well as the corresponding full-text guidelines, is available on the World Wide Web sites of the American College of Cardiology (www.acc.org) and the American Heart Association (www.americanheart.org). Single reprints of the executive summary are available for $5.00 each by calling 800-253-4636 (US only) or writing the American College of Cardiology, Educational Services, 9111 Old Georgetown Road, Bethesda, MD 20814-1699. To purchase additional reprints up to 999 copies, call 800-611-6083 (US only) or fax 413-665-2671; 1000 or more copies, call 214-706-1466, fax 214-691-6342, or e-mail pubauth@heart.org (specify version: Executive Summary—71-0125; Full Text—71-1026).55© 2001 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association, Inc. [O] . Hunt Sharon A, Baker David W, Chin Marshall H, 2001

机译：ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：执行摘要美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（委员会修订1995年心脏评估和管理指南与美国心力衰竭学会认可的国际心脏和肺移植协会合作51）该文件于2001年11月获得美国心脏病学会理事会的批准，并于2001年9月获得美国心脏协会科学咨询和协调委员会的批准.52引用本文件时，美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会将赞赏以下引用格式：Hunt SA，Baker DW，Chin MH，Cinquegrani MP，Feldman AM，Francis GS，Ganiats TG，Goldstein S，Gregoratos G，Jessup ML，Noble RJ，Packer M，Silver MA，Stevenson LW。 ACC / AHA成人慢性心力衰竭评估和管理指南：摘要：美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告（修订1995年《美国心脏病学会评估和管理指南》的委员会心脏衰竭）。 J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 38：2101–13.53美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会竭尽全力避免由于外部关系或个人，专业或其他原因而引起的任何实际或潜在的利益冲突。写作小组成员的商业利益。具体而言，要求写作小组的所有成员提供所有可能被视为实际或潜在利益冲突的关系的披露声明。这些声明由上级工作组审查，在第一次会议上口头报告给写作小组的所有成员，并在发生变化时进行更新。54本文档以及相应的全文指南可在万维网上找到。美国心脏病学院（www.acc.org）和美国心脏协会（www.americanheart.org）的网站。致电800-253-4636（仅适用于美国）或写信给美国心脏病，教育服务学院，地址为9111 Old Georgetown Road，Bethesda，MD 20814-1699，可以执行摘要的单个重印本，每张5.00美元。要购买最多999份的其他重印本，请致电800-611-6083（仅限美国）或传真413-665-2671； 1000或更多副本，请致电214-706-1466，传真214-691-6342或电子邮件pubauth@heart.org（指定版本：执行摘要-71-0125；全文-71-1026）。55©2001美国心脏病学会和美国心脏协会有限公司
8. Evaluation of Usage and Responsiveness of NIMH (National Inst. of Mental Health) Research Grant Application System (RGAS). Part 1. Information Needs of the National Institute of Mental Health and an Evaluation of the Research Grant Application System (RGAS). Part 2. Survey of Selected Public Health Service Information Systems and Final Summary of Recommendations to the Research Grant Application System (RGAS) [R] . Sutton, N. M. 1983

机译：评估NImH（国家心理健康研究所）研究资助申请系统（RGas）的使用和反应。第1部分。国家精神卫生研究所的信息需求和研究资助申请系统（RGas）的评估。第2部分。选定的公共卫生服务信息系统调查和研究资助申请系统（RGas）建议的最终摘要

UK’s National Programme for IT welcomes recommendation for a more sociotechnical approach to evaluation: a commentary on the Greenhalgh evaluation of the summary care record

著录项

引文网络

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅