首页> 外文OA文献 >Intraoperative radiotherapy during radical prostatectomy for intermediate-risk to locally advanced prostate cancer: treatment technique and evaluation of perioperative and functional outcome vs standard radical prostatectomy, in a matched-pair analysis
【2h】

Intraoperative radiotherapy during radical prostatectomy for intermediate-risk to locally advanced prostate cancer: treatment technique and evaluation of perioperative and functional outcome vs standard radical prostatectomy, in a matched-pair analysis

机译:前列腺癌根治术中的术中放疗对局部晚期前列腺癌的中等风险:与标准根治性前列腺切除术在配对对分析中的治疗技术和围手术期和功能结局的评估

摘要

OBJECTIVE To evaluate a novel approach with intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) administered in the surgical field, after pelvic lymphadenectomy (PL) and before radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP), evaluating acute and late toxicity, complications and biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS), as the adequate treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer is still a controversial issue. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between June 2005 and October 2007, 33 consecutive patients with intermediate-risk or locally advanced prostate cancer were selected for PL + IORT + RRP. IORT was delivered by a mobile linear accelerator in the operating room (electron beam, 12 Gy at 90% isodose). According to the pathological findings further adjuvant radio- or hormone therapy could be administered. The median follow-up was 16 months. This group was compared retrospectively with a historical group of 100 patients who had undergone RRP and further adjuvant therapy, selected with equivalent criteria. The comparison was conducted as a matched-pair analysis. The perioperative outcomes (surgical time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusions, days of catheterization, days of drainage, days of hospitalization), continence as the functional outcome, acute and late toxicity, rate of complications and bPFS were evaluated and compared. RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the two groups were equivalent but the node count and the number of positive lymph nodes was higher in the IORT group. The IORT group had longer surgery, and a shorter hospital stay and catheterization. There were no differences in continence rate, and no major complications in either group. The acute and late toxicity and bPFS were equivalent. A retrospective comparison and the short follow-up were the major limitations. CONCLUSIONS IORT administered before RRP seems a feasible approach, with little effect on the variables evaluated.
机译:目的要评估在外科手术区域,盆腔淋巴结清扫术(PL)之后和根治性耻骨后前列腺切除术(RRP)之前进行术中放疗(IORT)的新方法,评估急性和晚期毒性,并发症和无生化进展的生存期(bPFS),由于对局部晚期前列腺癌的适当治疗仍然是一个有争议的问题。患者与方法在2005年6月至2007年10月之间,连续选择了33位中危或局部晚期前列腺癌患者进行PL + IORT + RRP治疗。 IORT是通过手术室中的移动式线性加速器(电子束,在90%的等剂量剂量下为12 Gy)输送的。根据病理结果,可以进行进一步的放射或激素辅助治疗。中位随访时间为16个月。回顾性地将该组与100例接受RRP和进一步辅助治疗的患者历史组进行比较,并按等效标准进行选择。比较是作为配对分析进行的。评估并比较围手术期结局(手术时间,估计失血量,输血量,导管插入天数,引流天数,住院天数),作为功能性结局的尿失禁,急性和晚期毒性,并发症发生率和bPFS。结果两组的基线特征相同,但IORT组的淋巴结计数和阳性淋巴结数目较高。 IORT组的手术时间更长,住院时间和导管插入时间也更短。两组的尿失禁率没有差异,也没有重大并发症。急性和晚期毒性与bPFS相当。回顾性比较和短期随访是主要的局限性。结论在RRP之前进行IORT似乎是一种可行的方法,对评估的变量影响很小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号