首页> 外文OA文献 >Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: a struggle for the meaning of fair trade
【2h】

Social accounting at Traidcraft plc: a struggle for the meaning of fair trade

机译:Traidcraft plc的社会会计:为公平贸易的意义而斗争

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide an account of the development and implementation of social accounting at the UK fair trade organisation Traidcraft plc. Design/methodology/approach – Using an ethnographic approach, the paper critically reflects on the role of this emerging form of accounting in an ongoing intra-organisational struggle for meaning within Traidcraft over the management of its “fair-trade” business. Findings – The paper argues that the implementation of a formal system of “social bookkeeping” largely failed to achieve its intended objective to further augment the organisation's accountability relationships with its key stakeholders. However, in the context of organisational change, the accounting intervention was nevertheless significant, in a quite unexpected (and possibly undesirable) way. Along with a number of other intra-organisational factors, the intervention produced a decisive, management-led change within the organisation towards a more commercial interpretation of its religious principles, which the organisation termed “New Traidcraft”. Originality/value – The paper contributes to the change/appropriation debate surrounding corporate social reporting by providing insights into the complex range of political, functional and social factors that may influence the outcome of social accounting interventions. The paper also provides evidence to support the argument that social and environmental accounting interventions can be influential (if not necessarily desirable) when they are aligned with substantive changes in the organisation itself. Add to: Session Reprints & permissions Request
机译:目的–本文的目的是提供有关英国公平贸易组织Traidcraft plc社会会计发展和实施的说明。设计/方法论/方法–使用人种学方法,论文批判性地反映了这种新兴会计形式在组织内部内部为Traidcraft对其“公平贸易”业务的管理进行意义争夺中的作用。调查结果–该论文认为,正式的“社会记账”系统的实施在很大程度上未能实现其预期的目标,即无法进一步增强组织与其主要利益相关者之间的问责关系。但是,在组织变革的背景下,会计干预仍然是非常重要的,其方式非常出乎意料(并且可能是不受欢迎的)。与组织内其他许多因素一起,干预措施在组织内产生了决定性的,管理层主导的变革,朝着对其宗教原则进行更商业化的解释,该组织称其为“ New Traidcraft”。独创性/价值–本文通过提供对可能影响社会会计干预结果的复杂政治,职能和社会因素的深入了解,为围绕公司社会报告的变更/拨款辩论做出了贡献。本文还提供了证据支持这样的论点,即社会和环境会计干预措施与组织本身的实质性变化保持一致时可能具有影响力(如果不一定是理想的话)。添加到:会话转载和权限请求

著录项

  • 作者

    Dey, Colin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号