首页> 外文OA文献 >The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial
【2h】

The SANAD study of effectiveness of carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate for treatment of partial epilepsy: an unblinded randomised controlled trial

机译:SANAD研究卡马西平,加巴喷丁,拉莫三嗪,奥卡西平或托吡酯治疗部分性癫痫的有效性:一项无盲随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Summary Background Carbamazepine is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with partial onset seizures. Several newer drugs possess efficacy against these seizure types but previous randomised controlled trials have failed to inform a choice between these drugs. We aimed to assess efficacy with regards to longer-term outcomes, quality of life, and health economic outcomes. Methods SANAD was an unblinded randomised controlled trial in hospital-based outpatient clinics in the UK. Arm A recruited 1721 patients for whom carbamazepine was deemed to be standard treatment, and they were randomly assigned to receive carbamazepine, gabapentin, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, or topiramate. Primary outcomes were time to treatment failure, and time to 12-months remission, and assessment was by both intention to treat and per protocol. This study is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN38354748. Findings For time to treatment failure, lamotrigine was significantly better than carbamazepine (hazard ratio [HR] 0·78 [95% CI 0·63–0·97]), gabapentin (0·65 [0·52–0·80]), and topiramate (0·64 [0·52–0·79]), and had a non-significant advantage compared with oxcarbazepine (1·15 [0·86–1·54]). For time to 12-month remission carbamazepine was significantly better than gabapentin (0·75 [0·63–0·90]), and estimates suggest a non-significant advantage for carbamazepine against lamotrigine (0·91 [0·77–1·09]), topiramate (0·86 [0·72–1·03]), and oxcarbazepine (0·92 [0·73–1·18]). In a per-protocol analysis, at 2 and 4 years the difference (95% CI) in the proportion achieving a 12-month remission (lamotrigine-carbamazepine) is 0 (-8 to 7) and 5 (-3 to 12), suggesting non-inferiority of lamotrigine compared with carbamazepine. Interpretation Lamotrigine is clinically better than carbamazepine, the standard drug treatment, for time to treatment failure outcomes and is therefore a cost-effective alternative for patients diagnosed with partial onset seizures.
机译:发明背景卡马西平被广泛接受为部分发作性癫痫患者的首选药物。几种较新的药物具有针对这些癫痫发作类型的功效,但先前的随机对照试验未能告知这些药物之间的选择。我们旨在评估与长期结果,生活质量和卫生经济结果有关的功效。方法SANAD是英国一家医院门诊诊所的非盲随机对照试验。 A组招募了1721例卡马西平为标准治疗的患者,并随机分配接受卡马西平,加巴喷丁,拉莫三嗪,奥卡西平或托吡酯治疗。主要结果是治疗失败的时间和缓解12个月的时间,评估的目的是根据治疗的意图和根据方案进行。该研究已注册为国际标准随机对照试验,编号为ISRCTN38354748。发现对于治疗失败的时间,拉莫三嗪显着优于卡马西平(危险比[HR] 0·78 [95%CI 0·63-0·97]),加巴喷丁(0·65 [0·52-0·80] )和托吡酯(0·64 [0·52-0·79]),与奥卡西平(1·15 [0·86-1·54])相比,优势不明显。在12个月的缓解时间上,卡马西平明显优于加巴喷丁(0·75 [0·63-0.90]),估计表明卡马西平相对于拉莫三嗪具有非显着优势(0·91 [0·77–1] ·[09]),托吡酯(0·86 [0·72-1·03])和奥卡西平(0·92 [0·73-1·18])。根据协议分析,在2年和4年时,达到12个月缓解的比例(拉莫三嗪-卡马西平)的差异(95%CI)为0(-8至7)和5(-3至12),提示与卡马西平相比,拉莫三嗪非劣效。解释拉莫三嗪在临床上优于标准的药物卡马西平,以缩短治疗失败的时间,因此对于诊断为部分发作的患者是一种经济有效的选择。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号