首页> 外文OA文献 >The Architecture of Analogy:An Inquiry into Aldo Rossi's Theory of the City, the Discipline, the Type, and the Analogue
【2h】

The Architecture of Analogy:An Inquiry into Aldo Rossi's Theory of the City, the Discipline, the Type, and the Analogue

机译:类比的体系结构:阿尔多·罗西的城市理论,学科,类型和类比研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this dissertation is to put forward conceptual frameworks to inquire into and update the following theoretical categories of Aldo Rossi’s architectural production: the city as an artefact, the idea of type, architectural autonomy, history understood as collective imagination, and the concept of the analogical city. On one hand, our inquiry puts forward a close reading of particular aspects of Rossi’s formal and theoretical production, examining Rossi’s work as well as other commentators on Rossi’s work. On the other, the inquiry is supported by a selective reading of major figures as well as canonical theories and projects from the discipline of architecture. In both cases detailed readings of texts, drawings, built and unbuilt work is undertaken to extrapolate the theoretical categories as well as key descriptive characteristics. These develop the conceptual frameworks which are diagrams that visualise the relations between categories and characteristics. Revisiting Rossi helps us re-engage with architecture as a discipline that simultaneously produces its own historical-formal body of knowledge while co-determining the wider social imagination. The discipline has, in the last decades, become weakened by the continuing proliferation of unique architecture-objects and the rejection of architecture’s fixed terms of reference. By discussing the category of discipline, we point to future work on how architecture negotiates its formal condition and its societal role. We re-learn that architecture is an instrument that puts forward singular alternative ways of living – formal possibilities – and critical interpretations of existing conditions – theoretical alternatives. The primary method of inquiry is visual and literary montage. Simultaneously analytic and synthetic, montage provides a way to isolate theoretical categories and formal examples from the mass of material, then produce new insight by making connections between things otherwise different.
机译:本文的目的是提出概念框架,以探究和更新奥尔多·罗西的建筑生产的以下理论类别:城市为人工制品,类型概念,建筑自治,被理解为集体想象力的历史以及建筑概念。类比城市。一方面,我们的询问提出了对罗西形式和理论作品某些方面的仔细阅读,研究了罗西的著作以及其他对罗西著作的评论家。另一方面,通过对主要人物以及建筑学的规范理论和项目的选择性阅读来支持该研究。在这两种情况下,都需要对文本,图纸,已建成和未建成的作品进行详细阅读,以推论理论类别以及关键的描述特征。这些开发了概念框架,这些框架是使类别和特征之间的关系可视化的图表。重访罗西(Rossi)帮助我们重新参与建筑学这一学科,同时产生自己的历史形式知识体系,同时共同确定更广泛的社会想象力。在过去的几十年中,由于独特的建筑对象的不断扩散和对建筑固定职权范围的拒绝,该学科变得越来越弱。通过讨论学科类别,我们指出了有关建筑如何协商其形式条件和社会角色的未来工作。我们重新学习了建筑是一种工具,它提出了单一的替代生活方式–形式可能性–对现有条件的批判性解释–理论替代。探究的主要方法是视觉和文学蒙太奇。同时进行分析和合成,蒙太奇提供了一种方法,可以从大量材料中分离理论类别和形式实例,然后通过使事物之间的联系不同而产生新的见解。

著录项

  • 作者

    McEwan Cameron;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号