首页> 外文OA文献 >Análisis de la sentencia n.º 001-10-SIN-CC. Casos n.º 0008-09-IN y 0011-09-IN sobre acción de inconstitucionalidad en contra de la Ley de Minería y efectos posteriores (Jurisprudencia)
【2h】

Análisis de la sentencia n.º 001-10-SIN-CC. Casos n.º 0008-09-IN y 0011-09-IN sobre acción de inconstitucionalidad en contra de la Ley de Minería y efectos posteriores (Jurisprudencia)

机译:分析第001-10-SIN-CC号判决。 0008-09-IN和0011-09-IN号案件,涉及违反采矿法的违宪行为及其后果(法理学)

摘要

This paper aims to analyze the decision issued by the Constitutional Court for Transition within the unconstitutionality presented against the Mining Act. Proponents, in the main, formal allege unconstitutional by the Mining Law have been issued by the Committee on Legislation and Oversight (National Assembly during the Transitional Period after the adoption of the 2008 Constitution) without the prior execution of a legislative pre query, this query being a collective right of national, indigenous peoples and communities recognized in Article 57 paragraph 17 of the Constitution of the Republic. The Constitutional Court ruled Transition to reject the unconstitutionality confirming the constitutionality of the regulatory body and the substantial and non-formal pre-legislative consultation.
机译:本文旨在分析过渡宪法法院针对《采矿法》提出的违反宪法的裁决。立法和监督委员会(2008年宪法通过后的过渡时期的国民议会)发布了《采矿法》中主要的正式指控,这违背了《采矿法》的规定,而没有事先执行立法前的查询,即该查询是《共和国宪法》第57条第17款所承认的民族,土著人民和社区的集体权利。宪法法院裁定过渡法院拒绝承认宪法违宪,以确认监管机构是否合法,并进行实质性和非正式的立法前协商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号