首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat
【2h】

Comparison of a rhizosphere-based method with other one-step extraction methods for assessing the bioavailability of soil metals to wheat

机译:基于根际的方法与其他一步提取方法评估土壤金属对小麦的生物利用度的比较

摘要

There is no method recognized as a universal approach for evaluation of bioavailability of heavy metals in soil. Based on the simulation of the rhizosphere soil conditions and integration of the combined effects of root-soil interactions as a whole, a rhizosphere-based method has been proposed. Wet fresh rhizosphere soil was extracted by low-molecular-weight organic acids (LMWOAs) to fractionate metal fractions of soil pools, which were then correlated with the metal contents of wheat roots and shoots. The rhizosphere-based method was compared with other one-step extraction methods using DTPA, EDTA, CaCl2, and NaNO3 as extractants and the first step of the Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) method. Simple correlation and stepwise multiple regression analysis were used for the comparison. Simple correlation indicated that the extractable Cu, Zn, Cr, and Cd of soils by the rhizosphere-based method were significantly correlated with the metal contents of wheat roots. For DTPA, BCR1 and EDTA methods there was a relatively poor correlation between the extractable Cu, Zn and Cd of soil and metal contents of wheat roots. Stepwise multiple regression analysis revealed that the equation of the rhizosphere-based method was the simplest one, and no soil properties variables needed to be added. In contrast, the equations of other one-step extraction methods were more complicated, and soil properties variables needed to be entered. The most distinct feature of the rhizosphere-based method was that the recommended method was suitable for acidic, neutral and near alkaline soils. However, the DTPA and EDTA extraction methods were suitable for calcareous soils only-or-only for acidic soils. The CaCl2, and NaNO3 extraction methods were only Suitable for exchangeable metals. In short, the rhizosphere-based method was the most robust approach for evaluation of bioavailability of heavy metals in soils to wheat. (c) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:没有一种方法被认为是评估土壤中重金属生物利用度的通用方法。基于对根际土壤条件的模拟,并结合了根-土相互作用的整体效应,提出了一种基于根际的方法。用低分子量有机酸(LMWOA)提取湿的新鲜根际土壤,分馏土壤池中的金属部分,然后将其与小麦根和苗的金属含量相关。将基于根际的方法与其他以DTPA,EDTA,CaCl2和NaNO3作为提取剂的一步提取方法以及社区参考局(BCR)方法的第一步进行了比较。比较采用简单相关和逐步多元回归分析。简单相关表明,根际法可提取的土壤中的铜,锌,铬和镉与小麦根的金属含量显着相关。对于DTPA,BCR1和EDTA方法,土壤中可提取的Cu,Zn和Cd与小麦根的金属含量之间的相关性较差。逐步多元回归分析表明,基于根际方法的方程式是最简单的,不需要添加土壤属性变量。相比之下,其他单步提取方法的方程则更为复杂,需要输入土壤属性变量。基于根际的方法最明显的特点是推荐的方法适用于酸性,中性和近碱性土壤。但是,DTPA和EDTA提取方法仅适用于石灰性土壤,或仅适用于酸性土壤。 CaCl2和NaNO3提取方法仅适用于可交换金属。简而言之,基于根际的方法是评估土壤中重金属对小麦生物利用度的最可靠方法。 (c)2004 Elsevier Ltd.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号