首页> 外文OA文献 >User education, bibliographic instruction or information literacy : semantic argument or philosophical debate
【2h】

User education, bibliographic instruction or information literacy : semantic argument or philosophical debate

机译:用户教育,书目指导或信息素养:语义论证或哲学辩论

摘要

Information literacy, bibliographic instruction or user education? These terms are widely used to describe the programmes designed to assist library clients in their use of library resources. There are as many variations in these programmes as there libraries. This study is designed to satisfy a professional curiosity regarding the appropriate uses of the above terms. Whilst the terms are often used interchangeably in the literature, their definitions suggest that this should not be occurring. Models of information seeking behaviours are compared with the definitions for user education, information literacy and bibliographic instruction. The matching of programme aims and objectives with the definitions of the three terms is an important aspect in the correct usage of the terms.
机译:信息素养,书目指导或用户教育?这些术语被广泛用于描述旨在帮助图书馆客户使用图书馆资源的程序。这些程序与库一样多。本研究旨在满足对以上术语的正确使用的专业好奇心。尽管这些术语在文献中经常可互换使用,但它们的定义表明这不应发生。将信息搜寻行为的模型与用户教育,信息素养和书目指导的定义进行了比较。程序目的和目标与这三个术语的定义的匹配是正确使用术语的重要方面。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lester Justine MacShane;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号