首页> 外文OA文献 >The case for case law: Recognising precedent in civil law systems
【2h】

The case for case law: Recognising precedent in civil law systems

机译:判例法案例:承认大陆法系先例

摘要

This paper will outline the normative framework in support of a formal and systemic recognition of the use of precedential case law within civil law systems. It will begin by, first, delineating the historical developments the led to the modern, relative devaluation of case law in civil law systems — in particular, by looking to ancient Roman dispute resolution mechanisms and, subsequently, the specific political ideals of revolutionary France. Secondly, it will look to current usage of these practices on a de facto basis; focusing, in particular on the courts of the European Union (and, specifically, the European Court of Justice). Thirdly, it will posit that such usage is both unavoidable and appropriate in the exercise of any dispute resolution within a legislative legal order. Ultimately, it will argue that such usage is only likely to increase as civil law legal systems continue to develop and that it would be of benefit to do so on a principled, rather than ad hoc and reactionary basis.
机译:本文将概述规范框架,以支持对民法系统中先例判例法的使用的正式和系统的认可。首先,它首先描述了导致民法体系判例法现代,相对贬值的历史发展,特别是着眼于古罗马争端解决机制,以及后来革命法国的具体政治理想。第二,它将事实上地考虑这些做法的当前使用情况;特别关注欧洲联盟的法院(特别是欧洲法院)。第三,它假定在立法法律秩序内解决争端时,这种用法是不可避免的,也是适当的。最终,它将辩称,这种用法只会随着大陆法系法律制度的不断发展而增加,并且在原则性而非临时性和反动性的基础上这样做将是有益的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tokmadzic Igor;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号