首页> 外文OA文献 >Local authority liability for flooding: Where should loss fall?
【2h】

Local authority liability for flooding: Where should loss fall?

机译:地方政府的水灾责任:损失应该落在哪里?

摘要

Flooding is New Zealand’s most frequent natural hazard the cost of which is outdone only by the recent Canterbury earthquakes. Local authorities are the bodies primarily tasked with protecting communities against flooding through a range of measures including physical works such as stopbanks. This essay explores the extent to which a local authority can be liable in tort where those physical works fail, causing damage. Direct liability and non-delegable duties are discussed, the latter addressing whether a local authority can nevertheless be liable having outsourced the construction of flood works to independent contractors. Additionally, whether local authorities should be liable for such damage or whether individual property owners ought to protect their own interests through insurance is discussed.This essay recommends that property owners should purchase private insurance, but that local authorities should remain liable at least for their own negligence.
机译:洪水是新西兰最常见的自然灾害,其损失仅在最近的坎特伯雷地震中才过高。地方当局是主要机构,其任务是通过一系列措施,包括停堤等有形工作,保护社区免受洪水侵害。本文探讨了那些实体工程失败并造成损害的地方当局在侵权中可能承担的责任。讨论了直接责任和不可委托义务,后者负责解决地方当局是否仍应将洪灾工程建设外包给独立承包商的责任。此外,还讨论了地方当局是否应对此类损害承担责任还是个人财产所有人是否应通过保险保护自己的利益。本文建议财产所有人应购买私人保险,但地方当局应至少对自己承担责任疏忽。

著录项

  • 作者

    Brennan Sean;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号