首页> 外文OA文献 >The Perceptions of Liaison Librarians, at a New Zealand Academic Institution, on the Role of Researchers in the Electronic Journal Environment
【2h】

The Perceptions of Liaison Librarians, at a New Zealand Academic Institution, on the Role of Researchers in the Electronic Journal Environment

机译:新西兰学术机构的联络馆员对研究人员在电子期刊环境中的作用的看法

摘要

The objective of this project was to examine how liaison librarians perceive the role of the academic researcher in the electronic journal environment. An interview process was undertaken with twelve liaison librarians from the Arts, Business and General Science disciplines, at a New Zealand tertiary institution, to elicit their views in this regard. Interviewees were questioned on the researcher/liaison librarian relationship in terms of their interaction involving direct and indirect forms of communication, on the topic of electronic journal publications. The direct forms of communication examined in this study, included e-mail, phone interviews and face-to-face interactions. The material placed on the Library subject resource web pages, concerning electronic journal publications, encapsulated the indirect method of communication between liaison librarian and researcher. This study was conceptualized with Anthony Giddens' "Structuration Theory" as a contextual basis.Continuous access and search methodologies were discovered to be the predominant themes between liaison librarians and researchers engaged in direct communication, on the topic of electronic publication. Access to available information found in electronic journals proved to be the most critical factor for researchers engaged in information retrieval and dissemination. Search enquiries amongst researchers were generally found to be more about ratification of their methodologies rather than a didactic engagement on how to carry out a particular search. Though these themes were found to be universal across the disciplines, variances between the faculties examined and between academic departments within their respective faculties were discovered. Input from researchers, concerning information on issues surrounding electronic journal publication, which is published on library subject resource pages has been found to be negligible. Although some academic departments do have certain researchers who do engage in the publication of these pages, they are situated in a distinct minority. Information on bibliometric measurement, copyright, and licensing are placed on these pages predominantly on the initiative of the liaison librarians examined.Issues surrounding scholarly communication, bibliometric measurement, open access platforms and institutional repositories have been found to be a part of the liaison librarian/researcher interaction, in this study. Whilst researchers do engage in these topics on a collegial level, they are also engaging with liaison librarians to better educate themselves in these matters. The principal influence on researchers, asking about these topics, is Performance Based Research Funding (PBRF), and most lines of questioning involve this facet of academic research. It can be said that liaison librarians believe that researchers play an active role in their relationship with the electronic publication environment. The role of the liaison librarian can be seen increasingly as that of facilitator rather than educator and this role is readily accepted by researchers. This study involved only a small research population, at one New Zealand tertiary institution and as such the findings cannot be regarded as universal to all researchers. In addition to this, the findings are based on the perceptions of liaison librarians and not researchers and although these perceptions offer a useful and unique view, it cannot be described as definitive. However this study can be utilized as a starting point for further research that examines both the views of researchers and the study of other academic institutions.
机译:该项目的目的是研究联络馆员如何看待学术研究人员在电子期刊环境中的作用。在新西兰的一家大专院校,对来自艺术,商业和普通科学学科的十二名联络馆员进行了采访,以征询他们的意见。就研究者/联络馆员之间的关系,就涉及电子期刊出版物的直接和间接交流形式的互动,对受访者进行了询问。在这项研究中检查的直接沟通形式包括电子邮件,电话采访和面对面的互动。放在图书馆主题资源网页上的材料,涉及电子期刊出版物,封装了联络馆员和研究人员之间的间接交流方法。本研究以安东尼·吉登斯(Anthony Giddens)的“结构理论”为背景进行了概念化。连续访问和搜索方法被发现是联络馆员与从事直接传播的研究人员之间关于电子出版物的主要主题。事实证明,获取电子期刊中的可用信息是从事信息检索和传播的研究人员的最关键因素。通常发现研究人员中的搜索查询更多地是关于其方法的批准,而不是关于如何进行特定搜索的有说服力的参与。尽管发现这些主题在各个学科中都是通用的,但是发现了所研究的学科之间以及其各自学科中的学术部门之间的差异。研究人员对于在图书馆主题资源页面上发表的有关电子期刊出版问题的信息的投入微不足道。尽管某些学术部门确实有某些研究人员参与了这些页面的发布,但它们却占少数。有关书目计量,版权和许可的信息主要放在所检查的联络图书馆员的主动下研究人员的互动,在这项研究中。尽管研究人员确实在大学级别上参与这些主题,但他们还与联络图书馆员进行交流,以更好地对这些问题进行自我教育。询问这些主题对研究人员的主要影响是基于绩效的研究经费(PBRF),并且大多数质疑问题都涉及学术研究的这一方面。可以说,联络馆员相信研究人员在与电子出版物环境的关系中起着积极的作用。联络图书馆员的角色可以越来越被看作是促进者而不是教育者,而这一角色已为研究人员所接受。这项研究仅涉及一个新西兰高等院校的一小部分研究人群,因此,这些发现不能视为所有研究人员的普遍研究。除此之外,研究结果基于联络馆员而不是研究人员的看法,尽管这些看法提供了有用且独特的观点,但不能说是确定的。但是,该研究可以作为进一步研究研究人员和其他学术机构研究的起点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Partner Brent Richard;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号