首页> 外文OA文献 >Should repairers have something to lien on? An analysis of reform options for the common law lien in the Personal Property Securities Act 1999
【2h】

Should repairers have something to lien on? An analysis of reform options for the common law lien in the Personal Property Securities Act 1999

机译:修理工应该留些东西吗? 《 1999年个人财产证券法》对普通法留置权的改革选择进行了分析

摘要

The repairer’s lien is one of the last remaining at common law. Under the Personal Property Securities Act 1999, a repairer’s lien over goods takes priority over any security interest in the same goods. Due to the advent of trading on credit terms, repairers are increasingly unable to rely on a lien as a means of security. Because of the nature of their work, ordinary security interests taken by repairers are likely to lose in any priority dispute.This paper addresses two broad points within this issue. The first point considered is whether the repairer’s interests should be protected, concluding that they should be afforded a super priority similar to the current scheme. The second point considered is the nature of reform that could be undertaken, concluding that a statutory lien should be inserted into the PPSA. This lien would generally subsist in credit trading environments whilst not adversely affecting the interest of other creditors.
机译:修理工的留置权是普通法中最后剩余的留置权之一。根据1999年《个人财产安全法》,维修人员对商品的留置权优先于同一商品的任何抵押权益。由于以信用条款进行交易的出现,维修人员越来越无法依靠留置权作为担保手段。由于维修工作的性质,维修人员在任何优先权纠纷中可能会失去普通的担保权益。本文着眼于此问题的两个主要方面。考虑的第一点是维修人员的利益是否应得到保护,得出的结论是应给予他们与当前计划相似的超级优先权。所考虑的第二点是可以进行的改革的性质,得出的结论是,应向PPSA中插入法定留置权。该留置权通常会存在于信贷交易环境中,而不会不利地影响其他债权人的利益。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hansen Tory;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号