首页> 外文OA文献 >Career Competencies and the Dual Ladder System for Corporate Researchers: the Case Studies of Nine Pharmaceutical Firms in Japan
【2h】

Career Competencies and the Dual Ladder System for Corporate Researchers: the Case Studies of Nine Pharmaceutical Firms in Japan

机译:职业能力和企业研究者的双重阶梯体系:日本九家制药公司的案例研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Career development for corporate researchers is of growing importance for at knowledge intensive firms, as skills, knowledge and the innovative efforts of well-developed corporate researchers may enhance their performance of research and development (R & D). Several scholars of human resource management have recently raised the question of what career development for corporate researchers will lead to the development of the organizational capabilities requisite to firm-level R & D (Farris & Corredo, 2002; Jones & Lichtenstein, 2000). Traditionally, many scholars and practitioners have argued that the dual career, or dual ladder, system – with both managerial and technical path – matches the career development needs of corporate researchers and keeps their careers from plateauing (Baugh & Roberts, 1994; Tucker et al., 1994). However, there are several problems with the dual ladder system regarding to corporate researchers’ career development, not only because the technical path may be isolated and, unequal to the managerial path (Allen & Katz, 1986; Farris & Corredo, 2002; Igbaria et al., 1999), but also because researchers’ career paths become more dynamic and varied than it allows for. As DeFillipi & Arthur (1994) argue, that the concept of career competencies can shed lights on the relationships between cumulative career development and continuous organizational capability building. Assuming the actual situation that R & D departments are multi-project organizations and an increasing number of researchers, unlike technical experts on technical paths, experience several projects in their project-oriented careers, firms need many researchers with technical competence and basic project management skills. This paper attempts to examine whether, in terms of career competencies, firms desire for many of their researchers to develop such individual competencies through a career development process. This paper is divided into following four parts. First, reexamining the above argument regarding the dual ladder system, we are critical of its focus mainly on career orientation and satisfaction of corporate researchers, and its ignorance of dynamics that could multiply their career paths. Second, assuming that the concept of career contingencies reveals to us what individual contingencies firms demand to build organizational capability, firms may encourage many researchers to acquire appropriate technical competence and basic project management competence, responding to the increasing needs for project leaders and staffs. Third, using the case studies of nine pharmaceutical firms based in Japan, we will examine how their actual career path systems work and how these firms need and develop a mixture of technical and managerial competence to contribute to research projects. Finally, we will conclude that firms need specific career contingencies for corporate researchers to run multi-project organizations, and that they are attempting to develop them through their career management systems.
机译:公司研究人员的职业发展对于知识密集型公司越来越重要,因为成熟的公司研究人员的技能,知识和创新努力可能会提高他们的研发表现。最近,一些人力资源管理学者提出了一个问题,即公司研究人员的职业发展将导致公司级研发所需的组织能力的发展(Farris&Corredo,2002; Jones&Lichtenstein,2000)。传统上,许多学者和实践者认为,具有管理和技术路径的双重职业或双重阶梯系统符合公司研究人员的职业发展需求,并使他们的职业保持平稳(Baugh&Roberts,1994; Tucker等人)。 (1994年)。然而,关于公司研究人员的职业发展,双阶梯系统存在一些问题,不仅因为技术路径可能是孤立的,而且与管理路径不等(Allen&Katz,1986; Farris&Corredo,2002; Igbaria等)。 (1999)等人,也是因为研究人员的职业道路变得比它所允许的更加动态和多样化。正如DeFillipi&Arthur(1994)所论证的那样,职业能力的概念可以为累积职业发展与持续组织能力建设之间的关系提供启示。假设研发部门是多项目组织且研究人员数量增加的实际情况,不像技术路线上的技术专家,他们在以项目为导向的职业中经历过多个项目,因此企业需要许多具有技术能力和基本项目管理技能的研究人员。本文试图从职业能力的角度研究企业是否希望其许多研究人员通过职业发展过程来发展这种个人能力。本文分为以下四个部分。首先,重新审视关于双阶梯系统的上述论点,我们批评它主要关注公司研究人员的职业导向和满意度,以及对可增加其职业道路的动力的无知。其次,假设职业突发事件的概念向我们揭示了企业建立组织能力所需的个人突发事件,企业可以鼓励许多研究人员获得适当的技术能力和基本的项目管理能力,以应对项目负责人和员工不断增长的需求。第三,我们将以日本的9家制药公司为例,研究他们实际的职业道路系统是如何工作的,以及这些公司如何需要并发展出技术和管理能力的组合来为研究项目做出贡献。最后,我们得出的结论是,公司需要特定的职业意外情况供公司研究人员运行多项目组织,并且他们正在尝试通过其职业管理系统来发展他们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号