首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two devices for respiratory impedance measurement using a forced oscillation technique: basic study using phantom models.
【2h】

Comparison of two devices for respiratory impedance measurement using a forced oscillation technique: basic study using phantom models.

机译:两种使用强制振荡技术测量呼吸阻抗的设备的比较:使用幻象模型的基础研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Since commercial forced oscillation technique (FOT) devices became available, they have been widely used for physiological assessments, mainly of obstructive lung diseases. However, it is not known whether the impedance values measured with different devices are identical. In this study, two FOT devices-the impulse oscillometry system (IOS) and the MostGraph (MG)-were compared using phantom models. The resistance values varied up to 10% from estimated values in both devices. Additionally, there was a difference in frequency dependence for the resistance between the devices. The reactance values measured with MG were higher than those measured with IOS. The effects of ventilation on the measured impedance values were higher for IOS than for MG, especially at lower frequencies. We concluded that the devices do not always generate identical impedance values. Thus, differences between the devices should be taken into consideration when evaluating clinical data.
机译:自从商用强制振荡技术(FOT)设备问世以来,它们已被广泛用于生理评估,主要是阻塞性肺疾病。但是,用不同的设备测量的阻抗值是否相同尚不清楚。在这项研究中,使用幻象模型比较了两个FOT设备-脉冲示波法测量系统(IOS)和MostGraph(MG)。两种器件的电阻值均与估计值相差高达10%。此外,器件之间的电阻在频率相关性上也有所不同。用MG测量的电抗值高于使用IOS测量的电抗值。对于IOS,通风对测得的阻抗值的影响要比对MG高,尤其是在较低频率下。我们得出的结论是,设备并不总是产生相同的阻抗值。因此,在评估临床数据时应考虑设备之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号