首页> 外文OA文献 >Patents in the Information and Communications Technology Sector - Development Trends, Problem Areas and Pressures for Change
【2h】

Patents in the Information and Communications Technology Sector - Development Trends, Problem Areas and Pressures for Change

机译:信息和通信技术领域的专利-发展趋势,问题领域和变革压力

摘要

The patent system was created for the purpose of promoting innovation by granting the inventors a legally defined right to exclude others in return for public disclosure. Today, patents are being applied and granted in greater numbers than ever, particularly in new areas such as biotechnology and information andcommunications technology (ICT), in which research and development (R&D) investments are also high. At the same time, the patent system has been heavily criticized. It has been claimed that it discourages rather than encourages the introduction of new products and processes, particularly in areas that develop quickly, lack one-product-one-patent correlation, and in which theemergence of patent thickets is characteristic. A further concern, which is particularly acute in the U.S., is the granting of so-called 'badpatents', i.e. patents that do not factually fulfil the patentability criteria. From the perspective of technology-intensive companies, patents could,irrespective of the above, be described as the most significant intellectual property right (IPR), having the potential of being used to protect products and processes from imitation, to limit competitors' freedom-to-operate, to provide such freedom to the company in question, and to exchange ideas with others. In fact, patents define the boundaries of ownership in relation to certain technologies. They may be sold or licensed on their ownor they may be components of all sorts of technology acquisition and licensing arrangements. Moreover, with the possibility of patenting business-method inventions in the U.S., patents are becoming increasingly important for companies basing their businesses on services. The value of patents is dependent on the value of the invention it claims, and how it is commercialized. Thus, most of them are worth very little, and most inventions are not worth patenting: it may be possible to protect them in other ways, and the costs of protection may exceed the benefits. Moreover, instead of making all inventions proprietary and seeking to appropriate as highreturns on investments as possible through patent enforcement, it is sometimes better to allow some of them to be disseminated freely in order to maximize market penetration. In fact, the ideology of openness is well established in the software sector, which has been the breeding ground for the open-source movement, for instance. Furthermore, industries, such as ICT, that benefit from network effects do not shun the idea of setting open standards or opening up their proprietary interfaces to allow everyone todesign products and services that are interoperable with theirs. The problem is that even though patents do not, strictly speaking, prevent access to protected technologies, they have the potential of doing so, and conflicts of interest are not rare. The primary aim of this dissertation is to increase understanding of the dynamics and controversies of the U.S. and European patent systems, with the focus on the ICT sector. The study consists of three parts. The first part introduces the research topic and the overall results of the dissertation. The second part comprises a publication in which academic, political, legal and business developments that concern software and business-method patents are investigated, and contentiousareas are identified. The third part examines the problems with patents and open standards both of which carry significant economic weight inthe ICT sector. Here, the focus is on so-called submarine patents, i.e. patentsthat remain unnoticed during the standardization process and then emerge after the standard has been set. The factors that contribute to the problems are documented and the practical and juridical options for alleviating them are assessed. In total, the dissertation provides a good overview of the challenges and pressures for change the patent system is facing,and of how these challenges are reflected in standard setting.
机译:创建专利制度的目的是通过授予发明人法律上界定的权利,以排斥他人以换取公开信息来促进创新。如今,正在以比以往更多的数量申请和授予专利,尤其是在生物技术,信息和通信技术(ICT)等新领域,其中研发(R&D)投资也很高。同时,专利制度遭到了严厉批评。据称,它不鼓励而不是鼓励采用新产品和新工艺,特别是在那些发展迅速,缺乏一品一专利相关性且专利丛生的特征的地区。在美国尤为严重的另一个问题是授予所谓的“ badpatents”,即实际上不满足可专利性标准的专利。从技术密集型公司的角度来看,无论上述哪种情况,专利都可以被描述为最重要的知识产权(IPR),具有被用来保护产品和工艺不受仿制,限制竞争对手自由的潜力,进行运营,为相关公司提供这种自由,并与他人交流思想。实际上,专利定义了与某些技术有关的所有权边界。它们可以自己出售或许可,它们可能是各种技术获取和许可安排的组成部分。此外,随着在美国对商业方法发明申请专利的可能性,专利对于基于服务的商业变得越来越重要。专利的价值取决于其要求保护的发明的价值以及其商业化方式。因此,它们中的大多数价值很少,大多数发明也不值得申请专利:有可能以其他方式对其进行保护,并且保护成本可能超过收益。而且,与其让所有发明成为专有技术并通过专利执行来寻求尽可能高的投资回报,不如让一些自由地散布以最大化市场渗透率,是更好的选择。实际上,开放意识形态已经在软件领域确立了良好的地位,例如,它已经成为开源运动的温床。此外,诸如ICT之类的受益于网络效应的行业并没有放弃设置开放标准或开放其专有接口以允许每个人设计与其可互操作的产品和服务的想法。问题在于,即使严格说来专利并不能阻止人们使用受保护的技术,但专利仍有可能这样做,而且利益冲突并不罕见。本文的主要目的是增加对美国和欧洲专利制度的动态和争议的理解,重点放在ICT领域。该研究包括三个部分。第一部分介绍了本文的研究主题和总体研究成果。第二部分包括出版物,其中调查了与软件和商业方法专利有关的学术,政治,法律和商业发展,并确定了争议领域。第三部分考察了专利和开放标准的问题,它们在ICT领域都具有重要的经济意义。在这里,重点是所谓的海底专利,即在标准化过程中未被注意的专利,然后在设定标准之后出现。记录了导致问题的因素,并评估了缓解这些问题的实践和法律选择。总体而言,本论文很好地概述了专利制度面临的挑战和变革压力,以及这些挑战如何在标准制定中得到体现。

著录项

  • 作者

    Soininen Aura;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号