首页> 外文OA文献 >Internet mobility, co-presence and purpose: contextualising internationalisation in research careers
【2h】

Internet mobility, co-presence and purpose: contextualising internationalisation in research careers

机译:互联网移动性,共存和目的:将研究生涯中的国际化背景化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper addresses the role that co-presence plays in the process of researcher and research internationalisation. Put simply, it considers how much time researchers need to spend in particular places (outside of their own country) in order to generate optimal conditions for knowledge creation and transfer. Drawing on empirical evidence gleaned from a range of recent research projects, it suggests that the need for co-presence is highly contextualised reflecting disciplinary and field-specific considerations.On the basis of this evidence, the paper critiques the received wisdom that permeates research policy in many national contexts equating excellence with internationalisation, and internationalisation with physical (and usually long stay) mobility. In so doing, it supports a growing concern that �researcher mobility should never be seen as an end-point in itself� (ESF, 2013b:3). It builds on the author�s previous work on the relationship between gender, mobility and career progression (Ackers, 2008; 2010). This work, supported by that of other authors such as Cox (2008), established the importance of a growing �mobility imperative� to the career progression of women. It also highlighted the role that the progressive institutionalisation of metrics associated with internationalisation was playing in this process (Ackers and Gill, 2008).Supporting a more evidence-based and nuanced approach to internationalisation, metrics goes some way to remove unintended consequences or discriminatory outcomes (Ackers, 2008) and to encourage a more merit-based approach to researcher evaluation.
机译:本文探讨了共存在研究人员和研究国际化过程中所扮演的角色。简而言之,它考虑了研究人员需要多少时间在特定的地方(他们自己的国家之外)度过,以便为知识创造和转让创造最佳条件。利用从一系列近期研究项目中获得的经验证据,它表明对共同存在的需求是高度背景化的,反映了学科和特定领域的考虑。在许多国家/地区,将卓越与国际化等同起来,将国际化与实体(通常是长期逗留)流动性等同起来。这样一来,它就越来越引起人们的关注,即``研究人员的流动性绝不应被视为自身的终点''(ESF,2013b:3)。它建立在作者先前关于性别,流动性和职业发展之间关系的研究的基础上(Ackers,2008; 2010)。这项工作得到了Cox(2008)等其他作者的支持,确立了日益增长的``机动性势在必行''对女性职业发展的重要性。它还强调了与国际化相关的指标的逐步制度化在此过程中所起的作用(Ackers和Gill,2008)。支持更基于证据和细微差别的国际化方法,指标以某种方式消除了意料之外的后果或歧视性结果(Ackers,2008),并鼓励采用基于绩效的方法来进行研究人员评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ackers Louise;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 spa
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号