首页> 外文OA文献 >SRC rock mass classification of tunnels under high tectonic stressudexcavated in weak rocks
【2h】

SRC rock mass classification of tunnels under high tectonic stressudexcavated in weak rocks

机译:高构造应力作用下隧道的SRC岩体分类 ud在弱石中开挖

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper describes the application of the SRC rockmass classification system to tunnels under high horizontal tectonicudstress excavated in weak rocks. The analysis was performed on 25 tunnels in Spain and Italy, for which it was found that muchudheavier supports than those estimated by the RMR index were required. SRC and RMR indices and other relevantudgeomechanical data were obtained during the site investigation and construction stages. Data corresponding to in situ stressudmeasurements, analysis of tectonic structures and instability problems arising during construction were used to asses the state ofudstress.udThe relationship between tunnel section convergence and the SRC and RMR indices was also analysed. Supportudmeasurements based on SRC and RMR classification were compared with those actually used during construction. Theseudanalyses indicate that for most of the tunnels examined, supports estimated using the SRC were much closer to those actuallyudinstalled than those predicted by the RMR index.udBased on the case histories presented, the factors mainly contributing to deformability and consequently to assessing supportudmeasurements were: high horizontal tectonic stress, low strength of rocks, overburden thickness and structural anisotropyudrelated to tunnel axis orientation. According to these factors, the tunnels investigated were classified as three types. Tunnelsudclassed as type I were those of low overburden thickness under high horizontal tectonic stress excavated in low strength rocks.udThe supports installed for these tunnels were much heavier than those predicted by the RMR index, being more in line withudthose indicated by the SRC index. The type II tunnels had thick overburdens and showed similar stress and strength conditionsudto the former. The supports installed were practically those foreseen by the SRC index, appreciably differing with respect to theudRMR index. Finally, tunnels included in the type III class were those under low to moderate tectonics stress, irrespective ofudoverburden thickness. These tunnels gave rise to RMR and SRC indices that provided acceptable results.
机译:本文介绍了SRC岩体分类系统在弱岩石高水平构造地应力下隧道的应用。在西班牙和意大利的25条隧道上进行了分析,发现需要比RMR指数估计的支重要大得多的支重。在现场调查和施工阶段获得了SRC和RMR指数以及其他相关的预算力学数据。利用现场应力测值,构造结构分析和施工过程中出现的失稳问题等数据来评估应力状态。 ud还分析了隧道断面收敛与SRC和RMR指标之间的关系。将基于SRC和RMR分类的支持测量与施工中实际使用的测量进行了比较。这些 udanaly分析表明,对于大多数已检查的隧道,使用SRC估算的支护比RMR指数所预测的支护更接近实际 udinstalled。 ud基于所提供的案例历史,主要是导致可变形性的因素,因此评估支护措施为:水平构造应力高,岩石强度低,覆盖层厚度和结构各向异性与隧道轴线方向有关。根据这些因素,所研究的隧道可分为三种类型。被分类为I型的隧道是在低强度岩石中开挖的高水平构造应力作用下的低覆盖层厚度。 ud这些隧道所安装的支架比RMR指数所预测的要重得多,与 r指示的更为一致SRC索引。 II型隧道覆盖层较厚,应力和强度条件与前者相似。实际上安装的支撑是SRC索引所预见的,在 udRMR索引方面明显不同。最后,III类隧道包括处于低至中等构造应力下的隧道,而不论覆盖层厚度如何。这些隧道产生了提供可接受结果的RMR和SRC指数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号