首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of two methods to measure permeability of dentin
【2h】

Comparison of two methods to measure permeability of dentin

机译:两种测量牙本质通透性的方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract: Dentin permeability was measured alternatively with two methods: a 10-ul capillaryudmethod with visual evaluation (PC) and a motorized automatic measuring device (Flodec, FD), both interposed in a simulated perfusion system. Eight human third molar coronal fragments were connected to systems, and their permeability to distilled waterudmeasured at 0, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 29 cmH2O pressure. Resultant permeabilities (in ul/s) forudboth techniques were interrelated with the use of the Passing and Bablok nonparametric method, which gives information about the range of constant and proportional errors and their 95% confidence intervals (95CI). The relationship between the methods is described by the regression formula: FD =-0.0003 + 0.945·PC, with 95CI for constant (-0.0015–0.0009) and for slope (0.738–1.168), indicating that both methods are interchangeable, although notudidentical.
机译:摘要:牙本质渗透性的测量方法有两种:一种是采用可视评估的10-ul毛细管/超声法(PC),另一种是通过电动自动测量装置(Flodec,FD),两者均插入模拟灌注系统中。将八个人类第三磨牙冠状碎片连接到系统,并在0、5、10、15、20、25和29 cmH2O压力下测量其对蒸馏水的渗透性。两种技术的最终渗透率(以ul / s为单位)与Passing和Bablok非参数方法的使用相关,该方法可提供有关常数误差和比例误差的范围及其95%置信区间(95CI)的信息。方法之间的关系由回归公式描述:FD = -0.0003 + 0.945·PC,常数(-0.0015–0.0009)和斜率(0.738–1.168)的95CI,表明这两种方法可以互换,尽管不是完全不同

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号