首页> 外文OA文献 >Choosing the type of income-contingent loan: risk-sharing versus risk-pooling
【2h】

Choosing the type of income-contingent loan: risk-sharing versus risk-pooling

机译:选择收入性贷款的类型:风险分担与风险分担

摘要

This paper analyses the choice between risk-sharing and risk-pooling income-contingent loans for higher education of risk-averse individuals who differ in their ability to benefit from education and inherited wealth. The paper identifies the possible outcomes of a majority vote between the two income-contingent schemes and provides several examples where the risk-pooling income contingent loan is preferred. The paper then discusses the implications on participation and voting outcomes if successful graduates are mobile and provides examples where the riskpooling incomecontingent loan remains being preferred. Risk-pooling schemes can however be prone to adverse selection problems, particularly if students are mobile. The paper explores the implications of allowing students to opt out of the riskpooling income-contingent loan for a pure loan. It shows that risk-pooling income-contingent loans can be sustained even when some students opt out.
机译:本文分析了在厌恶风险的人的高等教育中,风险分担和风险分担收入或有收入的贷款之间的选择,这些人的受教育能力和继承财富的能力不同。本文确定了这两种以收入为基础的计划之间进行多数表决的可能结果,并提供了一些示例,其中优先选择风险分担收入的或有贷款。然后,本文讨论了如果成功的毕业生可以流动的话,对参与和投票结果的影响,并提供了一些实例,在这些实例中,仍优先选择风险共享的或有收入贷款。但是,风险分担计划容易出现不利的选择问题,尤其是在学生流动的情况下。本文探讨了允许学生选择退出风险池性收入或有条件贷款以获得纯贷款的含义。它表明,即使某些学生选择退出,也可以维持风险分担收入的或有贷款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号