首页> 外文OA文献 >The British Labour Party’s leadership election of 2015
【2h】

The British Labour Party’s leadership election of 2015

机译:2015年英国工党领导选举

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

© 2016, © The Author(s) 2016. This article examines the British Labour Party’s leadership election of 2015, which resulted in the unexpected victory of the radical-left candidate, Jeremy Corbyn. It looks at the contest using Stark’s academic model of leadership elections, based on the tripod of selection criteria acceptability, electability and competence, and finds it wanting. Selection rules, which are downplayed in Stark’s model, are then examined, as Labour used a new selection system based on one-member-one-vote in 2015. While these are found to have had some impact, Corbyn’s victory cannot be explained primarily by institutions. The article reconsiders Stark’s model and shows that it failed because of the diminished significance of electability as a selection criterion in the Labour leadership contest of 2015. That largely reflected the circumstances in which the contest took place, in the aftermath of a demoralising election defeat for Labour.
机译:©2016,©作者2016。本文研究了英国工党2015年的领导人选举,该选举导致了激进左翼候选人杰里米·科宾(Jeremy Corbyn)的意外胜利。它根据选拔标准的可接受性,可选举性和能力的三脚架,使用斯塔克的领导力选举学术模型来查看比赛,并发现它是缺乏的。随后研究了在Stark模型中被低估的选拔规则,因为工党在2015年使用了一种基于一人一票的新选拔系统。尽管发现这些选拔规则产生了一些影响,但不能由以下因素来主要解释Corbyn的胜利:机构。这篇文章重新考虑了Stark的模型,并表明该模型失败了,因为在2015年的劳工领导力竞赛中,选举能力作为选择标准的重要性降低了。这在很大程度上反映了选举失败的惨败之后的情况。劳工。

著录项

  • 作者

    Quinn T;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号