首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of electronic heterodyne moire deflectometry and electronic heterodyne holographic interferometry for flow measurements
【2h】

A comparison of electronic heterodyne moire deflectometry and electronic heterodyne holographic interferometry for flow measurements

机译:电子外差云纹偏转法和电子外差全息干涉法在流量测量中的比较

摘要

Electronic heterodyne moire deflectometry and electronic heterodyne holographic interferometry are compared as methods for the accurate measurement of refractive index and density change distributions of phase objects. Experimental results are presented to show that the two methods have comparable accuracy for measuring the first derivative of the interferometric fringe shift. The phase object for the measurements is a large crystal of KD*P, whose refractive index distribution can be changed accurately and repeatably for the comparison. Although the refractive index change causes only about one interferometric fringe shift over the entire crystal, the derivative shows considerable detail for the comparison. As electronic phase measurement methods, both methods are very accurate and are intrinsically compatible with computer controlled readout and data processing. Heterodyne moire is relatively inexpensive and has high variable sensitivity. Heterodyne holographic interferometry is better developed, and can be used with poor quality optical access to the experiment.
机译:比较了电子外差莫尔偏转和电子外差全息干涉法作为精确测量相对象的折射率和密度变化分布的方法。实验结果表明,这两种方法在测量干涉条纹漂移的一阶导数方面具有相当的精度。用于测量的相位对象是KD * P的大晶体,其折射率分布可以准确而可重复地更改以进行比较。尽管折射率的变化仅引起整个晶体上大约一个干涉条纹的偏移,但该导数显示出相当大的细节以进行比较。作为电子相位测量方法,这两种方法都非常准确,并且与计算机控制的读数和数据处理本质上兼容。外差莫尔条纹相对便宜并且具有高可变灵敏度。外差全息干涉术得到了更好的发展,并且可以在光学质量较差的情况下用于实验。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stricker J.; Decker A. J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1985
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号