首页> 外文OA文献 >Vertical Crustal Motion Derived from Satellite Altimetry and Tide Gauges, and Comparisons with DORIS Measurements
【2h】

Vertical Crustal Motion Derived from Satellite Altimetry and Tide Gauges, and Comparisons with DORIS Measurements

机译:来自卫星测高仪和潮汐计的垂直地壳运动,以及与DORIS测量的比较

摘要

A somewhat unorthodox method for determining vertical crustal motion at a tide-gauge location is to difference the sea level time series with an equivalent time series determined from satellite altimetry, To the extent that both instruments measure an identical ocean signal, the difference will be dominated by vertical land motion at the gauge. We revisit this technique by analyzing sea level signals at 28 tide gauges that are colocated with DORIS geodetic stations. Comparisons of altimeter-gauge vertical rates with DORIS rates yield a median difference of 1.8 mm/yr and a weighted root-mean-square difference of2.7 mm/yr. The latter suggests that our uncertainty estimates, which are primarily based on an assumed AR(l) noise process in all time series, underestimates the true errors. Several sources of additional error are discussed, including possible scale errors in the terrestrial reference frame to which altimeter-gauge rates are mostly insensitive, One of our stations, Male, Maldives, which has been the subject of some uninformed arguments about sea-level rise, is found to have almost no vertical motion, and thus is vulnerable to rising sea levels. Published by Elsevier Ltd. on behalf of COSPAR.
机译:用于确定潮位计处垂直地壳运动的某种非常规方法是将海平面时间序列与由卫星测高仪确定的等效时间序列相区别。在两种仪器测量相同海洋信号的程度上,差异将占主导地位在标尺上垂直着陆运动。我们通过分析与DORIS大地测量站共处的28个潮位计的海平面信号来重新研究该技术。高度计垂直速率与DORIS速率的比较得出中位数差异为1.8毫米/年,加权均方根差异为2.7毫米/年。后者表明我们的不确定性估计(主要基于所有时间序列中假定的AR(1)噪声过程)会低估真实误差。讨论了其他误差的几种来源,包括高度参考仪表高度对之不敏感的地面参考系中可能存在的尺度误差,我们的气象站之一,马累,马尔代夫,这是一些有关海平面上升的不为人知的论点被发现几乎没有垂直运动,因此容易受到海平面上升的影响。由Elsevier Ltd.代表COSPAR发布。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号