首页> 外文OA文献 >Engineering management education post GFC and Copenhagen: are we on the right track?
【2h】

Engineering management education post GFC and Copenhagen: are we on the right track?

机译:GFC和哥本哈根之后的工程管理教育:我们走在正确的轨道上吗?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As world leaders around the globe navigate around the global financial crisis (GFC) and climate change agendas, aspiring engineering and engineering educators must rethink the enabling pathways for the personal, professional and educational development of professional engineering managers. A call for reform has exhibited in the early 21st century in form of numerous reports and literature around the globe. However, a revisit may now be required to ensure that the recommendations remain valid in the education of the next generation of engineering managers. The paper looks to the latest literature to review the findings of those pre GFC reports and highlights some of the existing engineering management and leadership programs around the world. It comments on the adequacy of those programs post GFC and provides a clearer picture of the key components and pathways of an aspiring engineering manager's learning journey. The issues that educators need address within course and program design are identified and discussed.
机译:随着全球领导人围绕全球金融危机(GFC)和气候变化议程而行,有抱负的工程和工程教育者必须重新考虑专业工程经理个人,职业和教育发展的有利途径。二十一世纪初,世界各地的大量报道和文学作品都展现出了改革的呼声。但是,现在可能需要重新审查以确保建议在下一代工程管理人员的教育中仍然有效。该白皮书将参考最新的文献,以回顾这些GFC之前报告的发现,并重点介绍全球现有的一些工程管理和领导力计划。它评论了全球金融危机之后这些计划的充分性,并为有抱负的工程经理的学习历程提供了更清晰的画面。确定并讨论了教育工作者在课程和课程设计中需要解决的问题。

著录项

  • 作者

    Goh Steven; Bullen Frank;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号