首页> 外文OA文献 >Guest editors' introduction to special theme issue of International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning: Doctoral designers: challenges and opportunities in planning and conducting educational research
【2h】

Guest editors' introduction to special theme issue of International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning: Doctoral designers: challenges and opportunities in planning and conducting educational research

机译:客座编辑对专题主题的介绍国际教育学与学习杂志:博士设计师:规划和开展教育研究的挑战与机遇

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

[Rationale]:udResearch methods textbooks (see for example Cohen, Manion & Morrison, 2007; Johnson & Christensen, 2004; Opie, 2004; Somekh & Lewin, 2005; Wiersma & Jurs, 2004) generally highlight the need for educational research to be rigorous and systematic in character. These characteristics are clearly crucial on a number of levels, from ‘being true’ in representations of research participants to demonstrating the researcher’s competence to offset recurring criticisms of educational research asudfragmented, ideologically biased and/or having little or no effect on practice (Pring, 2004; see also Hammersley, 2002; Scott, 2000; Wellington, 2000).ududDespite these injunctions, the planning and conducting of educational research are neither automatic nor easy. On the contrary, every step in the process involves audcomplex and sometimes controversial set of decisions and requires the exercise of finely honed judgment about the design and shape of the project. Educationaludresearchers draw on multiple sources of information and inspiration to frame and inform their negotiations around, past and through these potential shoals. The researchudprocess involves complex navigation of ethical, methodological and political stances to ensure legitimate, trustworthy and hopefully useful findings (see for exampleudBridges, 2003; Carmine, 1995; deMarrais & Lapan, 2004; Gold, 1999; Swann & Pratt, 2004; Tabachnick, 1998).ududThis special theme issue of the International Journal of Pedagogies and Learning is entitled “Doctoral Designers: Challenges and Opportunities in Planning andudConducting Educational Research”. It presents diverse engagements – by several intending, current and recently graduated doctoral candidates presently associatedudwith the Faculty of Education at the University of Southern Queensland, Australia – with the processes of planning and conducting educational research. What emerges is a rich array of methodological approaches to research which have been foregrounded as these particular doctoral designers have reflected on and interrogated theudcharacteristics of doctoral research. Their considerations have focused on what was and what might have been, as well as what was not and will not be, included in theirudresearch. This decision-making about the intentions and impact of doctoral research offers valuable knowledge about the difficult and challenging task of ‘designing’uddoctoral study.ududDespite the diversity of approaches, contexts and foci revealed in this theme issue, the papers have in common an engagement with one or more of the following organisingudquestions:udud Which issues are most important in making decisions about the planning and conduct of an educational research project?ud Which factors help to facilitate and/or restrict an educational research project’s legitimacy, trustworthiness and utility?ud How can and should educational researchers negotiate with multiple and sometimes competing stakeholders and gatekeepers?ud What are the particular challenges and opportunities of designing doctoraludeducational research?
机译:[方法]: ud研究方法教科书(例如,参见Cohen,Manion和Morrison,2007年; Johnson和Christensen,2004年; Opie,2004年; Somekh和Lewin,2005年; Wiersma和Jurs,2004年)总体上强调了教育研究的必要性。严谨有条理。这些特征显然在许多层面上都是至关重要的,从代表研究参与者的表现为``真实''到证明研究者的能力,以弥补对教育研究的反复批评,这些批评是分散的,意识形态上的偏见和/或对实践几乎没有影响(普林(Pring),2004年;又见哈默斯利(Hammersley),2002年;斯科特(Scott),2000年;惠灵顿(​​Wellington),2000年)。相反,过程的每个步骤都涉及复杂的决策,有时甚至是有争议的决策,并且需要对项目的设计和形状进行精细的判断。教育研究人员可以利用多种信息和灵感来源,围绕这些过去,过去以及通过这些潜在的暗访来制定和告知他们的谈判。研究 udprocess涉及道德,方法论和政治立场的复杂导航,以确保合法,可信和希望有用的发现(例如,参见 udBridges,2003; Carmine,1995; deMarrais&Lapan,2004; Gold,1999; Swann&Pratt, 2004;塔巴尼克(Tabachnick),1998)。 ud ud《国际教育学与学习杂志》的这一专题主题为“博士设计师:规划和开展教育研究方面的挑战与机遇”。它提出了与计划和进行教育研究过程有关的各种活动-目前与澳大利亚南昆士兰大学教育学院有联系的几名有意,目前和最近毕业的博士候选人。出现的是各种各样的研究方法论方法,随着这些特殊的博士设计者对博士研究的特征进行反思和审视,这些方法已被提出。他们的考虑集中在他们的 udresearch中包括过去和将来,以及过去和之后。关于博士研究的意图和影响的决策为“设计” “博士研究”的艰巨任务提供了宝贵的知识。 ud ud尽管在本主题中揭示了方法,背景和重点的多样性,但论文有通常会参与以下一个或多个组织疑问: ud ud哪些问题对于制定教育研究项目的计划和进行决策最重要?ud哪些因素有助于促进和/或限制教育研究项目的合法性,可信赖性和实用性?ud教育研究人员如何以及应该如何与多个(有时是相互竞争的)利益相关者和看门人进行谈判?ud设计博士学位教育研究的特殊挑战和机遇是什么?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号