首页> 外文OA文献 >Lost in transition? : audn exploration of attempts to reduce energy consumption by UK households.
【2h】

Lost in transition? : audn exploration of attempts to reduce energy consumption by UK households.

机译:迷路了吗? :a udn探索减少英国家庭能源消耗的尝试。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

As significant energy consumers, UK households need to reduce their energy use if the UK is to achieve its greenhouse gas reduction targets. Low levels of engagement and adoption rates of energy curtailment measures need to be overcome. Policies perceived as ‘fair’ can increase levels of engagement and acceptability. This thesis explores how households approach reducing their own energy use, the reductions they can achieve and any existing barriers. Households’ perception of what is ‘fair’ in the context of energy reductions is explored based on households' own experiences of energy reduction.ududHouseholds recruited from the South East of England participated in a mixed-methods study attempting to reduce their energy use over a 12-month period. Provided with estimates of their carbon footprints and a comparison to the UK average, the participants discussed their energy use, reductions and perceptions of how reductions could be encouraged fairly.ududParticipants’ energy use was something of an enigma, as were the associated GHG emissions. However, its use was protected and seen as ‘acceptable’ and ‘necessary’ for them to be comfortable in their day-to-day lives. Reducing their energy use was seen as possible and acceptable in areas of energy use viewed as ‘wasteful’ or ‘unnecessary’. While seen as possible, these targets were not necessarily achievable, with 50 per cent of the participants making measurable reductions, and 50 per cent unable to. Energy reductions of ten per cent were seen as possible, even by those unable to reduce, with little scope to move beyond this as participants did not know what they should or could do next. To move forward participants viewed fairness as important, citing energy reductions needing to be a valid, legitimate aim of society; with required reductions being achievable, supported by information, and placing the burden of responsibility on those who use the most.
机译:作为重要的能源消费国,如果英国要实现其温室气体减排目标,则需要减少其能源消耗。需要克服能源削减措施参与度低和采用率低的问题。被认为是“公平”的政策可以提高参与度和接受度。本文探讨了家庭如何减少自己的能源使用,他们可以实现的减少以及任何现有的障碍。基于家庭自身的节能经验,探索了家庭对节能减排的“公平”认识。 ud ud从英格兰东南部招募的家庭参加了一项旨在减少能源消耗的混合方法研究在12个月内使用。参与者提供了他们的碳足迹估算值并与英国平均水平进行了比较,讨论了他们的能源使用,减排量以及对如何合理鼓励减排的看法。 ud ud参与者的能源使用量是一个谜,与之相关的温室气体排放量。但是,它的使用受到了保护,被认为对他们的日常生活来说是“可以接受的”和“必需的”。减少能源使用被认为是可能的,并且在被视为“浪费”或“不必要”的能源使用领域可以接受。这些目标虽然被认为是可能的,但不一定能够实现,有50%的参与者减少了可观的数量,而50%的参与者却无法实现。人们甚至认为无法减少百分之十的能源,即使参与者不知道下一步该做什么或可以做什么,也没有什么余地。为了前进,参与者认为公平是重要的,理由是减少能源消耗必须是社会的合法合法目标;并在信息的支持下实现所需的减少,并将责任负担推给使用最多的人。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kukla Christopher;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号