首页> 外文OA文献 >Human Rights and Social Justice: the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the quiet revolution in international law
【2h】

Human Rights and Social Justice: the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and the quiet revolution in international law

机译:人权与社会正义:《残疾人权利公约》和国际法的悄然革命

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

On the 60th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of the Human Rights (UDHR) the Commonwealth Attorney General announced a national public consultation concerning the need for better human rights protection in Australia and the viability of a federal human rights charter. Whether or not the anticipated Charter includes social, economic and cultural rights is directly relevant to questions of social justice in Australia. This paper argues that the legislative acknowledgment of civil and political rights alone will not adequately address the human rights problems that are experienced in Australia. The reluctance to include economic, social and cultural rights in human rights legislation stems from the historical construction of an artificial distinction between civil and political rights, and economic social and cultural rights. This distinction was articulated and embedded in law with the translation of the UDHR into binding international law. It has been accepted and replicated in judicial consideration of the application on human rights legislation at the domestic level. The distinction between the two forms of rights underpins a general ambivalence about the capacity of human rights legislation to deliver social justice and echoes a critical tradition in legal philosophy that cautions against the reification of law. Coming into force early in the 21st century, the Convention of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities illustrates the effort of the international community to recognize and eschew the burden of the false dichotomy between civil and political and economic, social and cultural rights. Acknowledging the indivisible, interdependent and indissociable nature of human rights in Australia is a crucial step toward achieving human rights based social justice.
机译:在《世界人权宣言》(UDHR)发行60周年之际,英联邦检察长宣布了一项全国公众咨询,内容涉及在澳大利亚需要更好的人权保护以及联邦人权宪章的可行性。预期的《宪章》是否包括社会,经济和文化权利,直接关系到澳大利亚的社会正义问题。本文认为,仅凭立法承认公民权利和政治权利并不能充分解决澳大利亚所遇到的人权问题。不愿将经济,社会和文化权利纳入人权立法的原因是人为地区分公民和政治权利与经济社会和文化权利之间的历史渊源。通过将《世界人权宣言》翻译成具有约束力的国际法,这种区分得以明确表达并嵌入法律之中。在国内对人权立法的适用进行司法审查时,已经接受并复制了该法规。两种形式的权利之间的区别使人们普遍对人权立法实现社会正义的能力产生歧义,并呼应了法律哲学中的一种批判传统,即警告人们不要法律化。 《残疾人权利公约》于21世纪初生效,说明了国际社会为承认和避免公民与政治,经济,社会和文化权利之间的错误二分法而付出的努力。承认澳大利亚的人权具有不可分割,相互依存和不可分割的性质,这是实现基于人权的社会正义的关键一步。

著录项

  • 作者

    Weller Penny;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号