首页> 外文OA文献 >Not quite Eden : Steinbeck, Heidegger and human being's relationship with nature
【2h】

Not quite Eden : Steinbeck, Heidegger and human being's relationship with nature

机译:不完全是伊甸园:斯坦贝克,海德格尔与人类与自然的关系

摘要

The goal of this thesis is to carry out an ecocritical reading of John Steinbeck's 1952 novel East of Eden, drawing specifically on the vast philosophical texts of Martin Heidegger. Ecocriticism is the study of the relationship between humans and the environment, and the impact that this bond has on an individual as well as on human societies in general. This literary theory is only now beginning to bloom, which means that there are no set methods of precisely how ecocritical studies should be carried out at this time.udAccording to many literary theorists, Heidegger is the most significant precursor of ecocriticism. Heidegger, a 20th century German philosopher, writes extensively on theudconnection between humans at their natural environment, concluding that the closer one gets to the earth, the more authentically he or she can live. However, on the contrary, the more people are removed from the environment, the less they live to their full potential.udLiving apart from nature also makes it easier for humans to ignore the effects of their decisions, taking away their feeling of responsibility towards the earth. In East of Eden, Charles Trask's way of life shows precisely this type of denial, as he is in a position of complete domination of the soil. Samuel Hamilton, on the other hand, works the soil with a great deal of respect, even awe. His way of living is truly authentic in the Heideggerian sense.udHeidegger also explains how the use of technology can lead both towards and away from this genuine manner of living. Some technologies, notably the more traditional ones, help to create and bring about revealing in its truest sense; bringing a thing from absence to presence. These technologies treat nature with respect, leaving it as it should rightly be, while taking only what is necessary. Many modern technologies, on the other hand, do not respect the natural environment. This facet is particularly interesting to explore in East of Eden, as the novel is set at the turn of the 20th century. The times are changing and many traditional methods are being abandoned in favour of more rapid, precise and cost-effective ones. Also, it is the time of the First World War, a scene of unprecedented violence. Many of the technologies invented during these years are overwhelmingly destructive in nature.udThe gathering of resources is done indiscriminately, destroying anything which could be useful in the war efforts. The cost of the battle is immense; it is felt not only on the natural environment, but also on humanity, showing a staggering neglect of the value of human life.udAlthough the majority of my thesis is built upon a Heideggerian philosophical foundation, there is a second thinker whose writing helps to illuminate certain qualities of the relationship between humans and nature; Edward F. Ricketts. This 20th century ecologist is best known for his scientific work in Monterey Bay. Ricketts is also known forudhaving been one of Steinbeck's closest friends, a relationship which lasted until Ricketts untimely death. The essay which I refer to in this thesis was, in fact, published posthumously. It deals with the concept of breaking through, which is the idea that there are certain events in one's life which can entirely alter the way in which a person lives on this earth. According to Ricketts, it is necessary for a person to live a difficult situation, and if this person is open to growing from the experience, he or she will see the world in a whole new light. In East of Eden, it is Adam who lives a breaking through, as he comes to truly and deeply understand just how connected he is to nature - just how much he relies on nature and how much nature, in turn, relies on him.udIn my conclusion, I suggest that the time has come to look at East of Eden from a new, 'greener' perspective. The novel has been the source of many brilliant studies, butudvery few have explored its environmental aspects. I believe this cannot be done without taking Heidegger's philosophy as a primary foundation. The addition of Ricketts writings,udin my opinion, serves to give an entirely different, and yet parallel perspective of the very same topic; human being's relationship with nature. In the end, the characters of East of Eden teach us that there is much to be gained when one is willing to give back to the earth.
机译:本论文的目的是对约翰·斯坦贝克的1952年小说《伊甸之东》进行生态批判的解读,特别是借鉴马丁·海德格尔的大量哲学著作。生态批评是研究人类与环境之间的关系,以及这种联系对个人以及整个人类社会产生的影响。这种文学理论才刚刚开始盛行,这意味着目前尚无确切的方法来进行生态批评研究。 ud根据许多文学理论家,海德格尔是生态批评的最重要先驱。 20世纪德国哲学家海德格尔(Heidegger)广泛地论述了人类在自然环境下的“无联系”,认为人类越接近地球,他或她的生活就越真实。但是,相反地,更多的人被带离环境,他们发挥最大潜能的人就越少。 ud除了自然界之外,生活还使人类更容易忽略决策的影响,从而消除了对环境的责任感地球。在伊甸园以东,查尔斯·特拉斯克(Charles Trask)的生活方式恰恰表明了这种否认,因为他处于完全控制土壤的地位。另一方面,塞缪尔·汉密尔顿(Samuel Hamilton)则以极大的敬意甚至敬畏的态度对待土壤。他的生活方式在海德格尔的意义上是真实的。 ud海德格尔还解释了技术的使用如何能够引领和远离这种真正的生活方式。有些技术,尤其是较传统的技术,有助于创造和实现最真实的揭示。将事物从缺席带到现场。这些技术尊重自然,将自然本应地保留下来,而只考虑必要的东西。另一方面,许多现代技术不尊重自然环境。由于小说背景设定在20世纪初,因此在伊甸园东部探索这一方面特别有趣。时代在变化,许多传统方法被抛弃,取而代之的是更快速,更精确和更具成本效益的方法。同样,这是第一次世界大战的时期,这是前所未有的暴力场面。这些年来发明的许多技术本质上具有压倒性的破坏性。 ud资源的收集是不加区别地进行的,破坏了任何可能对战争努力有用的东西。战斗的代价是巨大的;尽管我的大部分论文都是建立在海德格尔的哲学基础上的,但仍有第二位思想家的写作对人类的价值产生了巨大的影响。阐明人与自然之间关系的某些品质;爱德华·里基茨。这位20世纪的生态学家以在蒙特利湾的科学工作而闻名。 Ricketts也是斯坦贝克最亲密的朋友之一,这种关系一直持续到Ricketts英年早逝。我在这篇论文中提到的文章实际上是在死后发表的。它涉及突破的概念,即一个人生命中的某些事件可以完全改变一个人在地球上的生活方式。根据里基茨(Ricketts)的观点,一个人必须生活在艰难的境地中,如果这个人愿意从经验中成长,那么他(她)将以全新的眼光看待世界。在伊甸园的东部,正是亚当(Adam)经历了一次突破,他真正真正地深刻了解了他与自然之间的联系-他对自然的依赖程度以及自然对他的依赖程度。 ud在我的结论中,我建议现在应该从一个新的“更绿色”的角度来看伊甸园以东。这本小说是许多杰出研究的来源,但很少有人探索其环境方面。我相信,如果不把海德格尔的哲学作为主要基础,就不可能做到这一点。我认为,增加Ricketts的著作可以为同一主题提供完全不同但平行的观点。人与自然的关系。最后,伊甸园东部的人物告诉我们,一个愿意回馈地球的人会有很多收获。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bouchard Alyson;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号