首页> 外文OA文献 >The systematic distortion hypothesis and diagnostically meaningful student ratings of university instructor teaching effectiveness.
【2h】

The systematic distortion hypothesis and diagnostically meaningful student ratings of university instructor teaching effectiveness.

机译:系统失真假设和具有诊断意义的大学教师教学效果学生评级。

摘要

In a series of four studies using data from a longitudinal investigation and a clinic database, the neuropsychological characteristics of normal and disabled reader groups were compared and contrasted and the predictive validity of 5 neuropsychological factors in determining later reading achievement was investigated. As expected, the performance of the disabled reader groups was significantly below that of the normal reader group; however, differences between the school and clinic samples of disabled readers were also observed. Disabled readers in the clinic sample were more impaired, overall, than either the normal or disabled readers from the school sample. The best predictor for later reading achievement proved to be the Complex Language/Semantic-Acoustic factor for the normal reader group at each age tested. For the disabled reader group, however, the results were more variable. At the younger (7-8 years) age, the best predictors were the Complex Motor and Visual-Spatial factors. By 9-10 years of age, the best predictors changed to the Simple Language/Word Knowledge and Complex Language factors. Nevertheless, at the older ages (10-12 years), a combination of the Complex Motor, Visual-Spatial, Simple Language, and Complex Language factors proved to be the best predictor for reading outcome. The results of the predictive validity study using children in the school sample were partially confirmed in the cross-validation study using a clinic-referred sample of disabled readers. The Complex Language factor emerged as the best predictor (concurrently) of reading achievement for disabled readers at the older (11-13 years) age. Disabled readers from the school and clinic samples were classified into subtypes identified in the literature on the basis of their neuropsychological test performances. As expected, the majority of disabled readers were found to have characteristics resembling children with a basic phonological processing disorder. However, the samples were not homogeneous and other subtypes including those characterized by word-finding, visual-perceptual, and u22mixedu22 deficits were also in evidence. The results were discussed with respect to theory and research on the prediction and remediation of reading disabilities, with suggestions for future research in this area.Dept. of Psychology. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses u26 Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis1992 .L639. Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-12, Section: B, page: 6592. Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 1991.
机译:在一项四项研究中,使用来自纵向调查和临床数据库的数据,对正常和残疾阅读者群体的神经心理学特征进行了比较和对比,并调查了5种神经心理学因素在确定以后阅读成绩方面的预测效度。不出所料,残疾阅读者群体的表现大大低于正常阅读者群体;但是,还观察到学校和诊所的残疾读者样本之间存在差异。总体而言,与学校样本中的正常或残障读者相比,诊所样本中的残障读者受损程度更大。事实证明,在每个测试年龄段,普通读者群体的阅读能力最好的预测指标是复杂的语言/语义-声学因素。但是,对于残疾阅读者群体而言,结果的可变性更大。在年轻(7-8岁)时,最好的预测因素是复杂运动和视觉空间因素。到9-10岁时,最佳预测变量已变为简单语言/单词知识和复杂语言因素。然而,在较老的年龄段(10-12岁),复杂运动,视觉空间,简单语言和复杂语言因素的组合被证明是阅读效果的最佳预测指标。使用学校样本中的儿童进行的预测有效性研究的结果在交叉验证研究中得到了部分证实,该交叉验证研究使用的是临床参考的残疾读者样本。对于年龄较大(11-13岁)的残疾读者,复杂语言因素已成为(同时)阅读成绩的最佳预测指标。根据他们的神经心理学测试表现,将来自学校和诊所样本的残疾读者分类为文献中确定的亚型。正如预期的那样,发现大多数残疾读者具有与基本的语音处理障碍儿童相似的特征。但是,样本不是同质的,其他亚型(包括以单词发现,视觉感知和“ ”缺陷为特征的那些亚型也被证明)。本文就阅读障碍的预测和矫正的理论和研究进行了讨论,并对这一领域的未来研究提出了建议。心理学。莱迪图书馆的纸质副本:论文主要论文-西楼地下室。 /电话号码:Thesis1992 .L639。资料来源:国际学位论文摘要,第53卷,第12卷,B页,第6592页。论文(博士学位)-温莎大学(加拿大),1991年。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lodzinski Adam C.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1991
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号