首页> 外文OA文献 >On the Right Side of History: How Lesbian and Gay Activists Galvanized Culture and Politics to make Massachusetts the First State with Legal Same-Sex Marriage
【2h】

On the Right Side of History: How Lesbian and Gay Activists Galvanized Culture and Politics to make Massachusetts the First State with Legal Same-Sex Marriage

机译:在历史的右边:男女同性恋活动家如何利用文化和政治手段使马萨诸塞州成为拥有合法同性婚姻的第一州

摘要

In November 2003 the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court sent issued a controversial ruling in favour of same-sex marriage in Goodridge v. Massachusetts Department of Public Health. In the decade preceding the Goodridge decision, the majority of US states had passed Defense of Marriage Act statutes, barring recognition of same sex marriage, and in the years following Goodridge many states passed constitutional amendments to define marriage between one man and one woman. What sets Massachusetts apart from the rest of the United States on this issue? Through the analysis of Massachusetts newspaper reports, archival material, and interviews with lesbian and gay movement leaders, this dissertation explores the social and political factors in Massachusetts that enabled this state to emerge without a Defense of Marriage Act in place, to win a legal battle to establish legal same-sex marriage, and to fight off attempts to establish an amendment that would have overturned the Goodridge decision. Evidence indicates that 1) cultural and demographic factors facilitated the early emergence of a lesbian and gay rights movement in Massachusetts, 2) throughout the 1970u27s and 1980u27s activists gained strategic capacity and cultivated elite and grassroots allies, 3) by the 1990u27s the victories of the lesbian and gay movement established policy legacies and contributed to cultural change in favour of lesbian and gay people and families, and 4) during the struggle for same-sex marriage in the 2000u27s activists successfully drew on the accumulated strategic skills, allies, and resources amassed over decades of movement activity to not only win same-sex marriage rights but to defeat several attempts by opponents to overturn legal recognition of same-sex marriage. This study illuminates the interaction between culture, structure, and agency and underscores the critical importance of engaging political structures, employing broad-based cultural tropes, and making informed strategic decisions to advance movement success.
机译:2003年11月,马萨诸塞州最高司法法院在Goodridge诉马萨诸塞州公共卫生部一案中发出了有争议的裁决,主张同性婚姻。在古德里奇决定之前的十年中,美国大多数州通过了《婚姻防卫法》法规,禁止承认同性婚姻,而在古德里奇之后的许多年中,许多州通过了宪法修正案,以定义一男一女的婚姻。是什么使马萨诸塞州在这个问题上与美国其他地区不同?通过分析马萨诸塞州的报纸报道,档案材料以及对男女同性恋运动领导人的采访,本论文探索了马萨诸塞州的社会和政治因素,这些因素使马萨诸塞州得以在没有《防卫婚姻法》到位的情况下出现,从而赢得了法律斗争建立合法的同性婚姻,并制止试图推翻古德里奇决定的修正案。有证据表明,1)文化和人口因素促进了马萨诸塞州男女同性恋权利运动的提早出现; 2)在整个1970年代和1980年代,活动家获得了战略能力并培养了精英和基层盟友,3)到1990年男女同性恋运动的胜利确立了政策遗产,并促进了有利于男女同性恋者和家庭的文化变革,以及4)在2000年代的同性婚姻斗争中,积极分子成功地利用了积累的在数十年的运动活动中积累了战略技能,盟友和资源,不仅赢得了同性婚姻权利,而且击败了对手的几次企图推翻对同性婚姻的法律认可的尝试。这项研究阐明了文化,结构和代理机构之间的相互作用,并强调了参与政治结构,运用基础广泛的文化比喻以及做出明智的战略决策以促进运动成功的至关重要性。

著录项

  • 作者

    McCauley Jaime;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号