Robert Fogelin (1985) formulated the thesis “that deep disagreements cannot be resolved through the use of argument, for they undercut the conditions essential to arguing.” The possibility of arguing presupposes “a shared background of beliefs and preferences,” and if such a background is not given, there is no way of “rational” dispute resolution. By contrast to this pessimistic view, I will propose a method that has been developed to overcome difficulties as described by Fogelin.
展开▼
机译:f3任意参数的“ g”数字实施解码程序的加法函数结构(Σ CD Sub>)[ 1,2 Sup> S g Sub> h1 Sup>] f(2 n Sup>)和[ 1,2 Sup> S g Sub> h2 Sup>] f三元表示法f(+ 1,0,-1)和双逻辑微分d 1,2 Sub>的算术公称(2 n Sup>)位置格式“额外代码RU” / dn→f 1,2 Sub>( + Sup>←↓- Sub>) d / dn Sub>“水平”活动参数2“并删除“级别1”中的活动逻辑“ +1”,“-1”→“ 0”(俄罗斯逻辑版本)