首页> 外文OA文献 >The Parenting Styles Self-Test: Reliability and construct validity.
【2h】

The Parenting Styles Self-Test: Reliability and construct validity.

机译:育儿风格自测:可靠性和建构效度。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As a result of research over the last decade, Gottman developed meta-emotion theory (Gottman, Katz, u26 Hooven, 1997). Meta-emotion refers to oneu27s thoughts and feelings about emotion. The meta-emotion construct is intended to capture parentsu27 fundamental attitude toward emotion in themselves and their children. In research to date, the meta-emotion philosophy of the parent has been determined through a lengthy, structured interview. Gottman (1997) has written a book for parents and included a brief self-report questionnaire derived from the structured interview. Although current research uses the structured interview, it would be beneficial if the self-test could be used in research rather than the lengthy structured interview. The current research evaluated the internal consistency, the test-retest reliability, and the construct validity of this new measure. Participants were also asked for their thoughts and feelings about the research and the new measure. Eighty-nine mothers and eleven fathers completed the questionnaire once. A subset of the sample (71 mothers and 9 fathers) completed the questionnaires a second time (interval range 60--90 days). The internal consistency of the measure was good for three of the parenting styles, but was poor for the fourth parenting style. The test-retest reliability was statistically significant for all four parenting styles. The predominant parenting style changed from the first to the second administration for less than ten percent of participants. The construct validity was poor. Participants reported that the current study was interesting and informative, but indicated that the response format was too restrictive and that some items were difficult to answer. Unexpectedly, participants represented only two of the four parenting styles. Although limited by certain considerations, this study provides some evidence for the reliability and limited validity of this new measure, and further refinement would likely add to improving the measureu27s psychometric properties.Dept. of Psychology. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses u26 Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis1999 .L43. Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 40-03, page: 0785. Adviser: J. Hakim-Larson. Thesis (M.A.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 1999.
机译:作为过去十年研究的结果,戈特曼发展了元情感理论(戈特曼,卡茨,霍文,1997年)。元情感是指人们对情感的想法和感受。元情感构造旨在捕获父母自己和孩子对情感的基本态度。迄今为止的研究中,通过长时间的结构化访谈确定了父母的元情感哲学。戈特曼(Gottman,1997)为父母写了一本书,其中包括从结构化访谈中得出的简短自我报告调查表。尽管当前的研究使用结构化访谈,但如果可以在研究中使用自测而不是冗长的结构化访谈,那将是有益的。当前的研究评估了该新措施的内部一致性,重测信度和构造效度。与会者还被问及对研究和新措施的想法和感受。八十九位母亲和十一位父亲完成了问卷。样本的一部分(71位母亲和9位父亲)第二次完成了问卷(间隔60--90天)。量度的内部一致性对于三种育儿风格来说是好的,但是对于第四种育儿风格来说是差的。所有四种育儿方式的重测信度在统计学上均具有统计学意义。主要的育儿方式从第一次施政转变为第二次施政,参与人数不到百分之十。构造有效性差。与会者报告说,当前的研究有趣而有益,但指出答复形式过于严格,有些项目难以回答。出乎意料的是,参与者只代表了四种育儿方式中的两种。尽管受某些考虑因素的限制,但本研究为这项新措施的可靠性和有限有效性提供了一些证据,并且进一步完善可能会改善该措施的心理测量特性。心理学。莱迪图书馆的纸质副本:论文主要论文-西楼地下室。 /电话号码:Thesis1999 .L43。资料来源:国际硕士摘要,第40卷,第0785页。顾问:J。Hakim-Larson。论文(硕士)-温莎大学(加拿大),1999。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee Catharine Helen.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1999
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号