首页> 外文OA文献 >Breaking the Transsubstantive Pleading Mold: Public Interest Environmental Litigation After Ashcroft v. Iqbal

【2h】

Breaking the Transsubstantive Pleading Mold: Public Interest Environmental Litigation After Ashcroft v. Iqbal

机译：打破实质性诉求模式：Ashcroft诉Iqbal案后的公共利益环境诉讼

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Foster Scott;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2011
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. RUMORS OF CONLEY'S DEMISE HAVE BEEN GREATLY EXAGGERATED: THE IMPACT OF BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION V. TWOMBLY ON PLEADING STANDARDS IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION [J] . Brook Detterman Environmental law . 2010,第1期

机译：康利的毁灭性谣言已被大肆宣扬：Bell ATLANTIC CORPORATION v。Tmbmbly对环境诉讼标准的影响
2. Ashcroft v. Iqbal: The Sleeper 2009 Supreme Court Decision for Patent Litigators? [J] . Kenneth R. ORourke, Mark S. Davies, Chris Hagale Intellectual property & technology law journal . 2009,第12期

机译：Ashcroft诉Iqbal：2009年Sleeper最高法院针对专利诉讼人的裁决？
3. Vindicating Public Environmental Interest: Defining the Role of Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China [J] . Juan Chu Ecology law quarterly . 2018,第3期

机译：维护公共环境利益：界定中国环境公共利益诉讼的作用
4. Research on plaintiff qualification of the environmental civil public interest litigation [C] . Tingting SHI, Yi CHEN, Ting ZHANG, International Seminar on Education, Management and Social Sciences . 2019

机译：原告民事公共利益诉讼原告资格研究
5. Ground-Breaking but Not So Effective: Environmental Public Interest Litigation Filed by NGOs in China [D] . Zhang, Qing. 2020

机译：地面突破但没有那么有效：非政府组织在中国提出的环境公共利益诉讼
6. 1719Public health response to a school-based norovirus gastroenteritis outbreak: Environmental sampling as a novel investigative tool [O] . Emily Hall, Jessica Smith, Sibeso Joyner, 2014

机译：1719年针对学校诺如病毒性肠胃炎暴发的公共卫生应对：将环境采样作为一种新颖的调查工具
7. Plausibility Pleading Revisited and Revised: A Comment on Ashcroft v. Iqbal [O] . Bone, Robert G. 2010

机译：重新审视和修改合理性诉求：Ashcroft诉Iqbal案评论

Breaking the Transsubstantive Pleading Mold: Public Interest Environmental Litigation After Ashcroft v. Iqbal

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅