首页> 外文OA文献 >The controversies of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2011 : creation and communication of derivative works (二次創作) by Netizens through the internet as play
【2h】

The controversies of the Copyright (Amendment) Bill 2011 : creation and communication of derivative works (二次創作) by Netizens through the internet as play

机译:《 2011年版权(修订)条例草案》的争议:网民通过互联网在游戏中创作和传播衍生作品(二次创作)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The HK Government’s public consultation on “Treatment of Parody under the Copyright Regime” ended on 15 November 2013. This is part of the consultations regarding the Copyright (Amendment) Bill (“the Bill”) introduced in June 2011 which stirred up heated debates regarding the liabilities of those who create and communicate derivative works via the internet without the prior consent of the copyright owners concerned. This round of consultation generated no less amount of controversies. “Netizen” organizations such as Derivative Works Concerned Group and Keyboard Frontier jointly proposed a “4th Option” in addition to the Government’s threeand introduced the concept of “User Generated Content”. Despite the Government’s repeated reassurance that they were open to the public’s opinion, the prospect of this option being adopted and incorporated into the wordings of the upcoming Bill remains highly doubtful.It is not intended in this paper to dig into the detailed legal issues surrounding these consultations. Instead, what exactly do these netizens do with the internet media, especially such social media as Facebook (“FB”) and Golden Discussion Forum (“GDF”) via creating and circulating their derivative works is of interest here. The ultimate question is: why are they so afraid of the Bill?
机译:香港政府于2013年11月15日结束了关于“版权制度下的模仿处理”的公众咨询。这是有关2011年6月提出的《版权(修订)法案》(“该法案”)的咨询的一部分,引发了关于未经相关版权所有者事先同意,通过互联网创作和传播衍生作品的人的责任。这一轮磋商产生了不少争议。 “衍生作品相关小组”和“键盘前沿”等“网民”组织在政府的三个提案之外共同提出了“第四种选择”,并引入了“用户生成内容”的概念。尽管政府一再保证他们接受公众的意见,但这种选择是否被采纳并纳入即将到来的法案的措词的前景仍然令人怀疑,本文无意于探讨与这些选择有关的详细法律问题。咨询。取而代之的是,这些网民通过创建和散布其衍生作品而对互联网媒体,尤其是Facebook(FB)和Golden Discussion Forum(GDF)等社交媒体究竟做了什么。最终的问题是:为什么他们如此害怕条例草案?

著录项

  • 作者

    CHOW Pok Yin Adrian;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号