首页> 外文OA文献 >Faragher, Ellerth, and the Federal Law of Vicarious Liability for Sexual Harassment by Supervisors: Something Lost, Something Gained, and Something to Guard Against
【2h】

Faragher, Ellerth, and the Federal Law of Vicarious Liability for Sexual Harassment by Supervisors: Something Lost, Something Gained, and Something to Guard Against

机译:Faragher,Ellerth和联邦主管对性骚扰承担的替代责任法:丢失,获得的东西和需要防范的东西

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In this Essay, the author faces his nightmare exam question: he must define u22sexual harassmentu22 to the satisfaction of several potential graders with different perspectives on sexual harassment law. His valiant effort to justify his response leads him to a discussion of the federal law of vicarious liability for sexual harassment by supervisors after the Supreme Courtu27s recent rejection of tort law respondeat superior analysis for such claims under Title VII. The author argues that, while the rejection of the tort standard for vicarious liability in Title VII claims removes the longstanding connection between Title VII law and state tort law, the result is appropriate given their different objectives. He further warns that, now that the ties between state tort law and Title VII have been severed, courts should not allow developments in sexual harassment cases to unduly influence state respondeat superior law.
机译:在这篇论文中,作者面临着他的噩梦考试问题:他必须定义“性骚扰”,以使对性骚扰法有不同观点的数名潜在的评分者满意。他为证明自己的回应辩护的英勇努力,导致他讨论了联邦最高法律对主管进行性骚扰的替代责任法的讨论,因为最高法院最近驳回了侵权法,对根据标题VII提出的此类要求做出了出色的分析。作者认为,尽管在第七章的权利要求中拒绝了替代责任的侵权标准,这消除了第七章的法律与州侵权法之间的长期联系,但鉴于其不同的目标,其结果是适当的。他进一步警告说,既然国家侵权法与第七章之间的联系已被切断,法院就不应允许性骚扰案件的发展对国家应诉高级法律产生不当影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Corbett William R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1999
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号