首页> 外文OA文献 >Public and private transaction costs in agri-environmental schemes : a case study on a site-specific grassland extensification scheme in Hesse, Germany
【2h】

Public and private transaction costs in agri-environmental schemes : a case study on a site-specific grassland extensification scheme in Hesse, Germany

机译:农业环境计划中的公共和私人交易成本:以德国黑森州特定地点的草地扩展计划为例

摘要

Agri-environmental schemes (AES) have become the most important policy instrument of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) to foster the provision of environmental goods via agriculture. Farmers receive public payments when they carry out agri-environmental commitments. Besides the costs for payments to farmers, transaction costs – as scheme organizational costs - emerge for both farmers and implementing administrations.This cumulative thesis addresses some unexplored aspects. It explains intra-scheme variances in magnitude and composition of public as well as private TCs with the help of a case study approach, taking the influence of the regulatory framework of the CAP explicitly into account. With the help of both quantitative and qualitative data and methods, the thesis investigates•Reasons for differences in private TCs (Article 1, see chapter 5)•Influences of the CAP/EAFRD regulations on public TCs and resulting spillovers onto private TCs (Article 2, see chapter 6),•Differences in local public TCs (Article 3, see chapter 7).Overall, the results reveal that a) the EAFRD regulations set the framework for AES design and implementation and thus influences the magnitude of both public and private TCs, b) the CAP framework causes allocative and distributive effects on both public and private TCs in Hesse and thus affects TC composition and incidence, and finally c) the degree of this impact varies subject to foremost actor-related factors, which d) provides an explanation for intra-scheme TC variances. By this, the results of the thesis complement and extend existing findings and may help for the future design of agri-environmental schemes.
机译:农业环境计划(AES)已成为共同农业政策(CAP)中最重要的政策工具,旨在促进通过农业提供环境产品。农民在执行农业环境承诺时会收到公共付款。除了支付给农民的费用之外,农民和实施行政部门都出现了交易成本(作为计划组织成本)。这一累积论点涉及了一些未探索的方面。它借助案例研究方法,解释了公共和私人TC的方案内幅度和组成上的差异,并明确考虑了CAP监管框架的影响。借助定量和定性的数据和方法,本文进行了调查•私人TC差异的原因(第1条,请参见第5章)•CAP / EAFRD法规对公共TC的影响以及由此产生的对私人TC的溢出(第2条) (请参阅第6章),•本地公共TC的差异(第3条,请参见第7章)。总体而言,结果表明:a)EAFRD法规为AES设计和实施提供了框架,从而影响了公共和私有TC的规模TC,b)CAP框架对黑森州的公共和私人TC产生分配和分配影响,从而影响TC的构成和发生率,最后c)这种影响的程度取决于与演员相关的首要因素,d)提供计划内TC差异的解释。这样,本论文的结果将补充并扩展现有的发现,并可能有助于未来的农业环境计划设计。

著录项

  • 作者

    Weber Anja;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号