首页> 外文OA文献 >The Influence of program theory-based evaluation on the use of evaluation information: A longitudinal study
【2h】

The Influence of program theory-based evaluation on the use of evaluation information: A longitudinal study

机译:基于程序论的评估对评估信息使用的影响:一项纵向研究

摘要

Theory-based evaluation studies have long been promoted as increasing stakeholder knowledge of the program and improving decision-making (Bickman, 1987; Chen, 2004; Suchman, 1967; Weiss, 1998), but such advocacy has little empirical research support. This paper helps to redress this deficiency by reporting on an empirical study which investigated the relationship between the use of program theory as the basis for an evaluation study and the nature of the evaluation information generated and its utility.ud udThe investigation followed three program evaluation studies through their term and focused on the extent of theory use and the nature and influence of the information from each evaluation. A model of factors which it has been suggested influence the use of program evaluation information was developed and investigated (Alkin, 1985; Cousins & Leithwood, 1986, 1993; Cummings, 1997; Leviton & Hughes, 1981; Hudson-Mabbs, 1993; Pawson & Tilley, 1997; Preskill & Torres, 1997). Structural equation modeling was used to test and further explore the model, while qualitative data were used to gain further insight into the study findings.ud udThe investigation was not able to confirm that a greater use of program theory in an evaluation study improves the usefulness of evaluation findings. The study does, however, identify interactions between program theory and other predictor variables, such as the characteristics of the evaluation study, related to increased information use. It also provides further evidence regarding the importance of stakeholder involvement in an evaluation study on the extent to which they use and are influenced by evaluation information. Furthermore, this research provides insight into perceptions developed by many evaluators through experience and practice, such as the vulnerability of an evaluation study to contextual factors which typically are outside the control of the evaluation team.
机译:长期以来,基于理论的评估研究一直在被提倡,以增加利益相关者对该计划的了解并改善决策(Bickman,1987; Chen,2004; Suchman,1967; Weiss,1998),但是这种倡导很少有实证研究支持。本文通过报告一项实证研究来帮助纠正这种不足,该实证研究调查了使用程序论作为评估研究的基础与所生成的评估信息的性质及其实用性之间的关系。评估研究通过其术语进行,并侧重于理论运用的程度以及每次评估信息的性质和影响。已经开发并研究了一个可能影响程序评估信息使用的因素模型(Alkin,1985; Cousins&Leithwood,1986,1993; Cummings,1997; Leviton&Hughes,1981; Hudson-Mabbs,1993; Pawson) &Tilley,1997; Preskill&Torres,1997)。结构方程模型用于测试和进一步探索该模型,而定性数据用于获得对研究结果的进一步了解。 ud ud该调查无法确认在评估研究中更多地使用程序理论可以改善研究结果。评价结果的实用性。但是,该研究确实确定了程序理论与其他预测变量(例如评估研究的特征)之间的相互作用,这些相互作用与增加的信息使用有关。它还提供了有关利益相关者参与评估研究的重要性的进一步证据,这些研究涉及利益相关者使用评估信息的程度以及受评估信息影响的程度。此外,这项研究还可以洞悉许多评估人员通过经验和实践所形成的看法,例如评估研究容易受到通常不在评估团队控制范围内的环境因素的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hudson Sheri;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号