首页> 外文OA文献 >Escape from New York: Analyzing the Stateu27s Relative Interests in Proscribing the Withdrawal of Life Support and Physician-Assisted Suicide
【2h】

Escape from New York: Analyzing the Stateu27s Relative Interests in Proscribing the Withdrawal of Life Support and Physician-Assisted Suicide

机译:逃离纽约:分析州在禁止撤回生命支持和医师协助自杀方面的相对利益

摘要

This Note argues that states cannot consistently prohibit physician assisted suicide for terminally ill patients while they continue to allow the withdrawal of life support for even non-terminal patients. All of the state interests identified by the Supreme Court in rejecting a right to assisted suicide are implicated to a higher degree by withdrawal of life support. The primary reason for this difference is that withdrawal of life support often involves incompetent patients and surrogate decision making while assisted suicide by definition requires a competent patient choosing to hasten her death
机译:本说明认为,各州不能一贯禁止绝症患者使用医生协助的自杀,即使他们继续允许非绝症患者撤离生命支持。最高法院在拒绝协助自杀权时确定的所有国家利益都与生命支持的撤消有较高的关联。造成这种差异的主要原因是,生命支持的撤离通常涉及不称职的患者并代之以决策,而根据定义的辅助自杀则需要有能力的患者选择加速其死亡。

著录项

  • 作者

    Miller Colin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2003
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号