首页> 外文OA文献 >Critical Literacy vs. Reading Programs: Schooling as a Form of Control
【2h】

Critical Literacy vs. Reading Programs: Schooling as a Form of Control

机译:批判性文化与阅读计划:以控制为形式的学校教育

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the United States, despite years of educational research demonstrating the ineffectiveness and harm caused by reading programs based upon a behaviorist paradigm, political mandates of state and federal programs insist upon their continued use. One might conclude that this insistence is born out of ignorance, however, it seems clear that the populations most harmed by these programs are the poor and minorities. Privileged class students are also harmed because of the u22literalcyu22 (shallow u22literacyu22) these programs produce. I discuss the politics of literacy and language programs in the United States and how they serve to oppress as they reproduce the status quo. I also offer solutions anchored in generative ways of coming to know and expanded definitions of teaching, learning and literacy.
机译:在美国,尽管多年的教育研究表明,以行为主义范式为基础的阅读计划会造成无效和伤害,但州和联邦计划的政治要求仍坚持继续使用它们。可能会得出结论,这种坚持是无知之举,但是,显然,受这些方案损害最大的人群是穷人和少数民族。由于这些程序产生的 u22literalcy u22(浅 u22literacy u22),特权班的学生也受到了伤害。我讨论了美国的识字和语言计划政治,以及它们在再现现状时如何起到压迫作用。我还提供以创生方式为基础的解决方案,并扩展教学,学习和读写能力的定义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bahruth Roberto E.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2005
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号