首页> 外文OA文献 >Social networks and cooperation in electronic communities:a theoretical-empirical analysis of academic communication and Internet discussion groups
【2h】

Social networks and cooperation in electronic communities:a theoretical-empirical analysis of academic communication and Internet discussion groups

机译:电子社区中的社交网络和合作:学术交流和互联网讨论小组的理论-实证分析

摘要

The study examines the use of academic e-mailing lists and newsgroups on the Internet by university researchers in the Netherlands and England. Their use is related to three clusters of problems that are analyzed. Firstly, while there are considerable time costs for using Internet Discussion Groups, their potential benefits for the individual researcher and their impact on the informal academic communication structure are unknown. Are they information tools or social tools for enlarging the social networks of researchers? Do those researchers who have less contacts profit more from the opportunities to get in contact with other researchers such that existing inequalities between the 'haves' and 'have-nots' are reduced? Secondly, there are large disciplinary differences in the prevalence of the use of Internet tools. For knowing more about the preconditions for the successful introduction of a new Information & Communication Technology, it is useful to gain two insights. Which aspects of the communication system of a discipline inhibit or stimulate the use of an Internet tool and by which mechanisms do they so? Thirdly, it is unclear why some Internet Discussion Groups are more successful in reaching a satisfying academic discussion than others. How can an electronic group make sure that its members contribute to the discussion, provide help to others, and participate in the production of a collective good for the whole group? Which impact do offline social networks have on the online communication and how do institutional factors, such as a high degree of social embeddedness of an Internet Discussion Group into a 'real-life' academic community, influence the attainment of a satisfying discussion?
机译:这项研究调查了荷兰和英国的大学研究人员在互联网上使用学术电子邮件列表和新闻组的情况。它们的使用与所分析的三类问题有关。首先,尽管使用Internet讨论组会花费大量时间,但尚不清楚它们对单个研究人员的潜在好处及其对非正式学术交流结构的影响。它们是扩大研究人员社交网络的信息工具还是社交工具?那些联系较少的研究人员是否会从与其他研究人员接触的机会中获得更多的利益,从而减少“有”和“没有”之间的不平等现象?其次,在使用互联网工具的普遍性方面存在很大的学科差异。若要了解更多有关成功引入新的信息和通信技术的前提条件的信息,则有必要获得两种见解。一个学科的通信系统的哪些方面抑制或刺激了Internet工具的使用,以及它们是通过哪些机制使用的?第三,目前尚不清楚为什么某些互联网讨论小组在达成令人满意的学术讨论方面比其他小组更成功。电子小组如何确保其成员参与讨论,为他人提供帮助并参与为整个小组生产集体物品?离线社交网络对在线交流有哪些影响?体制因素(例如,Internet讨论小组对“现实生活”学术社区的高度社交嵌入度)如何影响令人满意的讨论?

著录项

  • 作者

    Matzat Uwe;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2001
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号