首页> 外文OA文献 >Managing work-life policies:disruption versus dependency arguments
【2h】

Managing work-life policies:disruption versus dependency arguments

机译:管理工作生活政策:破坏与依存关系论据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

What factors shape managerial attitudes towards the utilization of work-life policies? The influence of disruptiveness (Powell and Mainiero 1999) and dependency (Klein, Berman and Dickson 2000) arguments on managerial attitudes is examined using a vignette design. In this study, managers in four financial firms in the UK and the Netherlands were asked to judge hypothetical requests from employees to utilize work-life policies. Findings indicate that managers are mainly interested in the performance of their department or work unit, and work-life policies are often seen as disruptive. However, when the least disruptive request is considered (short-term leave), we find that dependency arguments also play an important role and managers are more likely to respond to their employees’ personal and family needs.
机译:哪些因素影响管理人员对使用工作生活政策的态度?使用小插图设计检查了破坏性(Powell和Mainiero 1999)和依赖(Klein,Berman和Dickson 2000)对管理态度的影响。在这项研究中,英国和荷兰的四家金融公司的经理被要求判断员工提出的使用工作生活政策的假设要求。调查结果表明,经理们主要对其部门或工作部门的表现感兴趣,而工作生活政策通常被认为具有破坏性。但是,当考虑到破坏性最小的请求(短期请假)时,我们发现依赖项的争论也起着重要的作用,经理人更有可能回应员工的个人和家庭需求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号