首页> 外文OA文献 >A single-year comparison of two methods of censusing breeding Red Knot and Sanderling in High Arctic Greenland
【2h】

A single-year comparison of two methods of censusing breeding Red Knot and Sanderling in High Arctic Greenland

机译:北极高地格陵兰两种抑制红结和桑德林繁殖的方法的年度比较

摘要

A uniquely intense field effort at Zackenberg, NE Greenland, in June–July 2003 made it possible, for the first time, to compare two methods of measuring breeding densities of two notoriously difficult-to-census High Arctic breeding shorebirds (Red Knot Calidris canutus and Sanderling Calidris alba): (1) mapping of displays and other activities of birds in a rapid assessment early in the season, and (2) systematic ‘roping’ of potential breeding areas to disturb and then find incubating birds on, or very close to, their nests. The latter method is particularly relevant to species that rely on crypsis to avoid nest detection. During 16 and 19 June an experienced observer, in a standardized way, mapped all visual observations of Red Knot and Sanderling over a 4.0 km2 study area, which consisted mainly of low-angle mountain slopes between altitudes of 100 and 400 m. The observations were interpreted to represent 8–9 ‘pairs’ of Red Knot and 13–17 ‘pairs’ of Sanderling. Observations nearby allowed for a few additional pairs of Red Knot. Between 17 June and 5 July a team of five observers systematically roped the same study area and found two Red Knot nests and 15 Sanderling nests. Most of the study area remained under daily scrutiny until 19 July, and during these visits we encountered two more families of Red Knots and seven more Sanderling families. Thus, the roping effort yielded a few more Sanderling ‘pairs’ than expected from the early-season survey, but fewer Red Knot. This may imply that either: (1) the early-season rapid assessment particularly overestimated the knot population, and/or (2) relative to Sanderlings, knot nests were heavily depredated before roping, and/or (3) incubating birds escaped notice during roping, and/or (4) some of the local Red Knots may not have started a breeding attempt at all. Further work with radio-tagged individuals is necessary to establish whether we need to invoke non-breeding as a cause of the discrepancy.
机译:2003年6月至7月,在格陵兰东北部Zackenberg进行的一次独特的密集工作,使得首次有可能比较两种测量两个众所周知难于普查的高北极繁殖shore鸟(红结Calidris canutus)繁殖密度的方法。和(Sanderling Calidris alba):( 1)在赛季初期进行快速评估,以绘制鸟类展示和其他活动的地图,(2)有系统地“种植”潜在的繁殖区域以打扰然后在附近或附近很近的地方孵化鸟类到他们的巢穴。后一种方法与依赖于低温动物以避免巢检测的物种特别相关。在6月16日至19日期间,一位经验丰富的观察员以标准化的方式在4.0 km2的研究区域内绘制了红结和桑德林的所有视觉观察图,该研究区域主要由海拔100至400 m的低角度山坡组成。这些观测结果被解释为代表“红结”的8–9个“对”和桑德林的13–17个“对”。附近的观测结果允许再增加几对“红结”。在6月17日至7月5日之间,由五名观察员组成的团队有条不紊地用绳索绑住了同一研究区域,发现了两个红结巢和15个桑德林巢。直到7月19日为止,大部分研究区域都受到日常检查,在这些访问中,我们遇到了另外两个红色结家庭和七个桑德林家庭。因此,扎根工作产生的桑德林“对”比季初调查所预期的多一些,但“红结”却较少。这可能意味着:(1)早期的快速评估特别是高估了结节的数量,和/或(2)相对于桑德林斯,结巢在系绳之前被严重淘汰,和/或(3)孵化期间没有注意到的鸟类和/或(4)一些当地的红结可能根本没有开始繁殖尝试。必须与带有无线电标签的个人进行进一步合作,以确定我们是否需要将非育种作为差异的原因。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号