首页> 外文OA文献 >Allocating Power Between Courts and Arbitrators - and Why Scholars of Federal Courts Should Care

【2h】

Allocating Power Between Courts and Arbitrators - and Why Scholars of Federal Courts Should Care

机译：法院和仲裁员之间的分配权-以及为什么联邦法院的学者应该关心

页面导航

著录项
相似文献
相关主题

著录项

作者
Bruhl Aaron-Andrew P.;
展开▼
作者单位

展开▼
年度 2010
总页数
原文格式 PDF
正文语种
中图分类

相似文献

外文文献
中文文献
专利

1. NO CLASS: FEDERAL COURT OVERTURNS ARBITRATOR'S CERTIFICATION [J] . GINSEY VARGHESE Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation . 2018,第4期

机译：没有等级：联邦法院推翻了仲裁员的证书
2. In a Big Boost for the Federal Arbitration Act, the Supreme Court Decides in Preston v. Ferrer that the Arbitrator Remains Supreme [J] . MICHAEL E. JOHNSON, PIRET LOONE Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation . 2008,第4期

机译：为了大大提高联邦仲裁法的效力，最高法院在普雷斯顿诉费雷尔案中裁定，仲裁员仍然是最高法院。
3. THE HAGUE CHOICE OF COURT CONVENTION AND FEDERAL POWER OVER STATE COURTS [J] . JORDI DE LA TORRE Georgetown Journal of International Law . 2013,第1期

机译：法院惯例的海格选择与州法院的联邦权力
4. The Power Laws of the Italian Constitutional Court, and Their Relevance for Legal Scholars [C] . Tommaso AGNOLONI, Ugo PAGALLO International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems . 2015

机译：意大利宪法法院的权力法，及其对法律学者的相关性
5. Litigating international human rights claims in United States federal courts and the separation of powers dilemma. [D] . Graham, Kenneth Leon. 1999

机译：在美国联邦法院提起的国际人权诉讼，以及三权分立的困境。
6. Federal Court Rules Bias in Federally Aided Hospitals Unconstitutional [O] . 1963

机译：联邦法院裁定联邦资助医院的偏见违宪
7. Allocating Power Between Courts and Arbitrators - and Why Scholars of Federal Courts Should Care [O] . Bruhl Aaron-Andrew P. 2010

机译：法院和仲裁员之间的分配权-以及为什么联邦法院的学者应该关心

Allocating Power Between Courts and Arbitrators - and Why Scholars of Federal Courts Should Care

著录项

相似文献

相关主题

期刊订阅