首页> 外文OA文献 >Onder aristocraten:over hegemonie, welstand en aanzien van adel, patriciaat en andere notabelen in Nederland, 1848-1914
【2h】

Onder aristocraten:over hegemonie, welstand en aanzien van adel, patriciaat en andere notabelen in Nederland, 1848-1914

机译:在贵族中:1848-1914年间在荷兰的贵族,贵族,贵族和其他贵族的霸权,财富和声望方面

摘要

Recently the history of aristocrats in the modern world captured the attention of a steadily growing number of historians and social scientists in several countries. Their disappearance from public life is evident everywhere. Blending of the old families in the upper middle classes of Europe is one of the leading themes in international historical research. Did aristocrats really merge with the upper middle classes? If so, why, when and how did this fusion take place? The Kingdom of the Netherlands is an interesting case in Europe. Traditionally the nation is known as a particularly bourgeois nation of merchants, ministers and bankers. In Jaap Moes’s study, based on historical research in Dutch Parliamentary Archives, the up until now hardly used lists of the highest tax payers in the provinces who were eligible for the First Chamber (equivalent of the British House of Lords) and a sample of Death Duty Records, it becomes unambiguously clear that Dutch aristocrats, defined as nobility and the old patrician families remained at the head of society in the Netherlands for half a century after their birthrights were abolished by the liberal constitution of 1848. At least until the First World War they were disproportionally present in government and overrepresented in the socio-economic elites of the highest tax payers in the Dutch provinces as well. These aristocratic families managed to adapt themselves to the changing world in modern times without losing their collective identity. They transformed by applying political, economical and socio-cultural reconversion strategies to confront the rising middle classes, the changing political culture and the process of re-urbanisation that gained momentum during the second half of the nineteenth century. Parallel to the upper middle classes and the emerging pillarised top ten of the consociational democracy, aristocrats remained an exclusive social elite in the ‘bourgeois’ kingdom of the Netherlands combining power and influence in politics, disproportionate wealth and a distinguished social status well into the twentieth century.
机译:最近,现代世界的贵族历史吸引了几个国家中越来越多的历史学家和社会科学家的注意。他们从公共生活中消失的现象无处不在。欧洲上层中产阶级中的老家庭融合是国际历史研究的主要主题之一。贵族真的与上层中产阶级合并吗?如果是这样,为什么,何时以及如何发生这种融合?荷兰王国在欧洲是一个有趣的案例。传统上,这个国家被称为商人,部长和银行家的特别资产阶级国家。在贾普·莫斯(Jaap Moes)的研究中,基于荷兰议会档案馆的历史研究,到目前为止,几乎没有使用有资格获得第一议院(相当于英国上议院)的省中最高纳税人的名单和死亡样本。值班记录清楚地表明,被定义为贵族和古老贵族家庭的荷兰贵族在其出生权被1848年自由宪法废除之后,在荷兰社会头上呆了半个世纪。至少直到第一世界为止战争期间,他们在政府中所占比例过高,在荷兰各省纳税人最高的社会经济精英中所占比例也过高。这些贵族家庭在不失去其集体身份的情况下设法适应了现代世界的变化。他们通过运用政治,经济和社会文化转型策略来应对,以应对不断增长的中产阶级,不断变化的政治文化以及在19世纪下半叶发展势头强劲的重新城市化进程。与上层中产阶级和新兴的有组织的民主社会十大支柱平行,贵族仍然是荷兰“资产阶级”王国中的独家社会精英,结合了政治上的权力和影响力,不成比例的财富和杰出的社会地位,直至20世纪世纪。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moes Jacobus Karst Sjoerd;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 nld
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号