首页> 外文OA文献 >Is networking different with doctors working part-time?:Differences in social networks of part-time and full-time doctors
【2h】

Is networking different with doctors working part-time?:Differences in social networks of part-time and full-time doctors

机译:兼职医生与人际网络有区别吗?:兼职医生与专职医生的社交网络存在差异

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Part-time working is a growing phenomenon in medicine, which is expected to influence informal networks at work differently compared to full-time working. The opportunity to meet and build up social capital at work has offered a basis for theoretical arguments. Methods: Twenty-eight teams of medical specialists in the Netherlands, including 226 individuals participated in this study. Interviews with team representatives and individual questionnaires were used. Data were gathered on three types of networks: relationships of consulting, communication and trust. For analyses, network and multilevel applications were used. Differences between individual doctors and between teams were both analysed, taking the dependency structure of the data into account, because networks of individual doctors are not independent. Teams were divided into teams with and without doctors working part-time. Results and Discussion: Contrary to expectations we found no impact of part-time working on the size of personal networks, neither at the individual nor at the team level. The same was found regarding efficient reachability. Whereas we expected part-time doctors to choose their relations as efficiently as possible, we even found the opposite in intended relationships of trust, implying that efficiency in reaching each other was higher for full-time doctors. But we found as expected that in mixed teams with part-time doctors the frequency of regular communication was less compared to full-time teams. Furthermore, as expected the strength of the intended relationships of trust of part-time and full-time doctors was equally high. Conclusion: From these findings we can conclude that part-time doctors are not aiming at efficiency by limiting the size of networks or by efficient reachability, because they want to contact their colleagues directly in order to prevent from communication errors. On the other hand, together with the growth of teams, we found this strategy, focussed on reaching all colleagues, was diminishing. And our data confirmed that formalisation was increasing together with the growth of teams.
机译:背景:非全日制工作在医学界正在日趋普遍,与全日制工作相比,预计对非正规工作网络的影响将有所不同。在工作中结识和积累社会资本的机会为理论辩论提供了基础。方法:荷兰的28个医学专家团队包括226人参加了这项研究。使用了与团队代表的访谈和个人问卷。在三种类型的网络上收集数据:咨询,沟通和信任的关系。为了进行分析,使用了网络和多层应用程序。由于个体医生的网络不是独立的,因此分析了个体医生之间和团队之间的差异,并考虑了数据的依赖性结构。团队分为有和没有兼职工作的团队。结果与讨论:与期望相反,我们发现兼职工作对个人网络的规模没有影响,无论是在个人还是团队层面。在有效的可达性方面也发现了同样的情况。尽管我们期望兼职医生尽可能有效地选择他们的关系,但我们甚至在预期的信任关系中发现了相反的情况,这意味着专职医生之间的相互联系效率更高。但是我们发现,与全职团队相比,在有兼职医生的混合团队中,定期交流的频率要少。此外,正如预期的那样,兼职和专职医生的预期信任关系的强度同样很高。结论:从这些发现中我们可以得出结论,兼职医生并不是通过限制网络规模或有效可达性来提高效率,因为他们想直接与同事联系以防止通信错误。另一方面,随着团队的成长,我们发现这种集中于所有同事的战略正在逐渐消失。我们的数据证实,正规化随着团队的增长而增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号