首页> 外文OA文献 >History, institutions, and selectivities in historical-materialist policy analysis: A sympathetic critique of Brand's State, context and Correspondence
【2h】

History, institutions, and selectivities in historical-materialist policy analysis: A sympathetic critique of Brand's State, context and Correspondence

机译:历史唯物主义政策分析中的历史,制度和选择性:对布兰德状态,背景和往来的同情批评

摘要

This contribution shares Ulrich Brand's reliance on critical theories of the state and hegemony. Based on three points of criti-cism, the author argues for a better elaboration of the context of policy making. First, he proposes to consider a broader range of theoretical currents than the interpretive accounts introduced by Brand: (1) A strategic-relational interpretation of historical institutionalism will be introduced, (2) featuring the concept of "periodisation" for a systematic understanding of historically evolving structures. In addition to the introduction of a broader range of theoretical currents, (3) Brand's proposed concept of "selectivities" will be further refined and specified to be better able to grasp the workings of the "institutional condensation of the correlation of forces" in the policy cycle. The proposed conceptualisation of historical-materialist policy analysis will be exemplified by a short stylised example of research on equalityoriented policies in South Africa. (author's abstract)
机译:这项贡献与乌尔里希·布兰德(Ulrich Brand)一样依赖国家和霸权的批判理论。基于批评的三点,作者主张对政策制定的背景进行更好的阐述。首先,他提议考虑比布兰德(Brand)引入的解释性解释更广泛的理论流:(1)将引入对历史制度主义的战略关系解释,(2)以“定期化”概念为特征,以系统地理解历史上不断发展的结构。除了引入更广泛的理论流之外,(3)布兰德提出的“选择性”概念将得到进一步完善和说明,以更好地掌握“力的相关性的机构凝结”的原理。政策周期。南非的平等导向政策研究的一个简短的程式化例子将例证历史唯物主义政策分析的拟议概念。 (作者的摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Leubolt Bernhard;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号